2010
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2199-11-73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference gene selection for quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction normalization during in vitro adventitious rooting in Eucalyptus globulus Labill

Abstract: BackgroundEucalyptus globulus and its hybrids are very important for the cellulose and paper industry mainly due to their low lignin content and frost resistance. However, rooting of cuttings of this species is recalcitrant and exogenous auxin application is often necessary for good root development. To date one of the most accurate methods available for gene expression analysis is quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qPCR); however, reliable use of this technique requires reference ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(132 reference statements)
4
65
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, ELF1B and ACTB, followed by TUA, were ranked as the most stable reference genes according to our GeNorm and NormFinder analyses, whereas the 18S gene was found to be the most unstable. Greater expression stability has already been demonstrated for the plant genes ELF1B (Jian et al, 2008;Hu et al, 2009), ACTB (Stolf-Moreira et al, 2011), and TUA (Jian et al, 2008;de Almeida et al, 2010). Previous plant gene expression studies have classified the 18S gene among the most stable (Stolf-Moreira et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2011), whereas in other studies, it is ranked as the least stable (de Almeida et al, 2010), which is consistent with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, ELF1B and ACTB, followed by TUA, were ranked as the most stable reference genes according to our GeNorm and NormFinder analyses, whereas the 18S gene was found to be the most unstable. Greater expression stability has already been demonstrated for the plant genes ELF1B (Jian et al, 2008;Hu et al, 2009), ACTB (Stolf-Moreira et al, 2011), and TUA (Jian et al, 2008;de Almeida et al, 2010). Previous plant gene expression studies have classified the 18S gene among the most stable (Stolf-Moreira et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2011), whereas in other studies, it is ranked as the least stable (de Almeida et al, 2010), which is consistent with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Compared with other studies of expression stability, such as adventitious rooting in Eucalyptus globulus (de Almeida et al, 2010) and Populus (Xu et al, 2011), in the different soybean tissues (Jian et al, 2008;Hu et al, 2009) and drought-stressed soybean roots and leaves (Stolf-Moreira et al, 2011), 18S transcripts were the most abundant (de Almeida et al, 2010;Stolf-Moreira et al, 2011). TUA2 [called TUB by Jian et al (2008)] and ELF1B exhibited the largest (Jian et al, 2008) and smallest (Hu et al, 2009) variations in Ct values, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most consistent result of the consensus rankings was that under all of the conditions, 18S rRNA ranked at or near the bottom. The gene 18S rRNA has been widely used as a reference gene for gene expression analyses for a number of species (Teste et al, 2009;de Almeida et al, 2010). However, herein, the data demonstrated that 18S displayed the lowest expression stability, with the lowest average gene ranking across all of the samples analyzed.…”
Section: Expression Stabilities Of the Candidate Reference Genescontrasting
confidence: 37%
“…2; Table 2) were ranked poorly based on the two softwares in this study, indicating that these genes should be avoided as internal controls when analyzing gene expression levels in A. mongolicus under abiotic stresses, whereas tubulin (Cortleven et al 2009;de Almeida et al 2010), ATPbinding cassettes transporter gene (Libauh et al 2008) and elongation factor gene (Nicot et al 2005;Tong et al 2009), have been reported to be invariant genes in other studies. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%