2019
DOI: 10.1167/19.12.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference-frames in vision: Contributions of attentional tracking to nonretinotopic perception in the Ternus-Pikler display

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, we found that not only can adaptation aftereffects be measured in both retinotopic and world-centered coordinates, but these aftereffects also can exist independently: when only a single retinotopic but multiple-screen coordinates or a single-screen region and multiple retinal locations were being adapted. This finding is consistent with previous work showing that aftereffects can be found in multiple reference frames ( Hisakata & Kaneko, 2019 ; Lauffs, Choung, Ogmen, Herzog, & Kerzel, 2019 ; Ogmen & Herzog, 2010 ; Peñaloza, Herzog, & Öğmen, 2020 ). The finding also suggests that the distance between two objects could depend on different, possibly separate mechanisms: an early representation residing in retinotopic maps and another higher level encoded in world-centered coordinates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Interestingly, we found that not only can adaptation aftereffects be measured in both retinotopic and world-centered coordinates, but these aftereffects also can exist independently: when only a single retinotopic but multiple-screen coordinates or a single-screen region and multiple retinal locations were being adapted. This finding is consistent with previous work showing that aftereffects can be found in multiple reference frames ( Hisakata & Kaneko, 2019 ; Lauffs, Choung, Ogmen, Herzog, & Kerzel, 2019 ; Ogmen & Herzog, 2010 ; Peñaloza, Herzog, & Öğmen, 2020 ). The finding also suggests that the distance between two objects could depend on different, possibly separate mechanisms: an early representation residing in retinotopic maps and another higher level encoded in world-centered coordinates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the object appeared static behind the occluder (dynamic occluder, static shape). In this case, elements of the shape remained within a static reference frame, which guides the attribution of stimulus features according to group identity (Lauffs et al, 2019). One could argue that the preserved retinotopic correspondences within the static reference frame allowed symmetry perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the short temporal scale (around 300 ms), the within-frame grouping corresponds to retinotopic processing, whereas the between-frames grouping mainly adopts nonretinotopic processing ( Thunell et al. 2016 ; Lauffs et al. 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%