2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2004.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference frame, angular momentum, and porphyroblast rotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One group of workers (Bell 1985;Bell and Johnson 1989;Bell et al 1992aBell et al , 1992bHickey and Bell 1999) have strongly argued that porphyroblasts do not rotate with respect to an external frame of reference and that even 'snow-ball' type spiral inclusion trails can be reinterpreted as a product of repeated overprinting deformation and transposition of the matrix foliation around a growing and non-rotating porphyroblast. The other group supports the existing and 'traditional' view of rotation of porphyroblasts in non-coaxial flow to explain strongly folded and rotated inclusion trails in porphyroblasts (Schoneveld 1979;Vernon 1988;Busa and Grey 1992;Visser and Mancktelow 1992;Passchier et al 1992;Williams and Jiang 1999;Jiang and Williams 2004). However, there is an inherent ambiguity in the interpretation of spiral inclusions by either rotation and non-rotation models (Johnson 1993a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…One group of workers (Bell 1985;Bell and Johnson 1989;Bell et al 1992aBell et al , 1992bHickey and Bell 1999) have strongly argued that porphyroblasts do not rotate with respect to an external frame of reference and that even 'snow-ball' type spiral inclusion trails can be reinterpreted as a product of repeated overprinting deformation and transposition of the matrix foliation around a growing and non-rotating porphyroblast. The other group supports the existing and 'traditional' view of rotation of porphyroblasts in non-coaxial flow to explain strongly folded and rotated inclusion trails in porphyroblasts (Schoneveld 1979;Vernon 1988;Busa and Grey 1992;Visser and Mancktelow 1992;Passchier et al 1992;Williams and Jiang 1999;Jiang and Williams 2004). However, there is an inherent ambiguity in the interpretation of spiral inclusions by either rotation and non-rotation models (Johnson 1993a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…However, it led to a model that suggested that spiral and staircase inclusion trails also formed without rotation of the porphyroblasts and this led to 2 further decades of debate (e.g. Passchier et al 1992;Jiang and Williams, 2004). Although a large data bank on the orientation of foliation intersection axes preserved in porphyroblasts (FIAs) strongly suggests that porphyroblasts do not rotate during ductile deformation, no one had succeeded in providing an explanation of this process using continuum mechanics, analogue or computer modelling.…”
Section: Inclusion Trails Defined By a Differentiated Crenulation Clementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflicting kinematic models have been postulated for the development of 'millipede' and 'rotational' microstructures preserved in porphyroblasts involving porphyroblast rotation (e.g. Jiang and Williams, 2004;Jessell and others, 2009), non-rotation (e.g. Aerden and Sayab, 2008;Bell and Hobbs, 2010) or little relative rotation (e.g.…”
Section: Lower-crustal Flow Beneath the Tibetan Plateau: Evidence Fromentioning
confidence: 99%