2016
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5516-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reexcision Surgery for Breast Cancer: An Analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) MasterySM Database Following the SSO-ASTRO “No Ink on Tumor” Guidelines

Abstract: Following the SSO-ASTRO "no ink on tumor" guideline publication, a reduction in overall reexcision rates and reexcision rates for close margins after initial BCS was observed in the ASBrS Mastery database. More widespread implementation outside this group of early adopters is anticipated with ongoing dissemination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the agreement on these recommendations is different between centers and the choice of optimal margins depends mainly on the surgeons' practice and methods of margin assessment by pathologists which was supported by the current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines . Accepting closer margins of excision is a means of reducing re‐operation rates, as has been shown in invasive disease . However, planning a wider macroscopic margin in higher risk cases or tailoring the scrutiny of margin assessment to the risk factors are other strategies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the agreement on these recommendations is different between centers and the choice of optimal margins depends mainly on the surgeons' practice and methods of margin assessment by pathologists which was supported by the current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines . Accepting closer margins of excision is a means of reducing re‐operation rates, as has been shown in invasive disease . However, planning a wider macroscopic margin in higher risk cases or tailoring the scrutiny of margin assessment to the risk factors are other strategies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…42 Accepting closer margins of excision is a means of reducing re-operation rates, as has been shown in invasive disease. 43 However, planning a wider macroscopic margin in higher risk cases or tailoring the scrutiny of margin assessment to the risk factors are other strategies.…”
Section: Oncology-american Society For Radiation Oncology Has Publishedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is based on the results from a meta-analysis that demonstrated an increase of 2.44 in the odds ratio of local recurrence for positive margins (tumour on ink) but with no significant benefits demonstrated for wider margins [8]. Interestingly, only relatively small further reductions in re-operation rates from 20.2% to 16.5% [52] and from 21.4% to 15.1% [53] have been observed following acceptance of the 2014 SSO-ASTRO guidelines and these reduced rates could still be considered excessive. Extrapolation of re-operative rates of 15% combined with the annual incidence of breast cancer and the increasing popularity of breast conserving surgery, amounts to many thousands of women undergoing potentially unnecessary operations with a significant health and economic cost to the patient and healthcare provider [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all, adoption of these guidelines has the potential to reduce re-excision rates with, more importantly, a decrease in patient’s anxiety, morbidity, cost, adverse effect on cosmesis, and a delayed start to systemic therapy. The consensus panels recognised that anyhow there are circumstances in which margins wider than no ink on the tumour may be indicated for patients with invasive cancer and in which margins less than 2mm may be acceptable for patients with DCIS [13, 14, 15]. …”
Section: Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%