2013
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reexamining the Minimum Viable Population Concept for Long‐Lived Species

Abstract: For decades conservation biologists have proposed general rules of thumb for minimum viable population size (MVP); typically, they range from hundreds to thousands of individuals. These rules have shifted conservation resources away from small and fragmented populations. We examined whether iteroparous, long-lived species might constitute an exception to general MVP guidelines. On the basis of results from a 10-year capture-recapture study in eastern New York (U.S.A.), we developed a comprehensive demographic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Protection of population will work in tandem with introduction management to strengthen the population size, and it would require the metapopulation to reach its MVP size for its ensured persistency. This is in agreement with Shoemaker et al 25 who proposed that while applying MVP for long-lived species, protection of population can serve as a viable option for conservation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Protection of population will work in tandem with introduction management to strengthen the population size, and it would require the metapopulation to reach its MVP size for its ensured persistency. This is in agreement with Shoemaker et al 25 who proposed that while applying MVP for long-lived species, protection of population can serve as a viable option for conservation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…; Hylander & Ehrlén ; Shoemaker et al . ). Populations with positive growth rates and long times to quasi‐extinction may persist in relatively unsuitable macroclimates due to long extinction lags and/or location in suitable microhabitats which are not modelled by global SDMs (Dullinger et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Assessment of a population's probability of extinction should therefore include both demographic and genetic data. Although demographic data can be used to estimate population viability (e.g., Enneson and Litzgus 2009;Shoemaker et al 2013), the implications of genetic data may be less obvious, and the two factors also interact. For example, a severe demographic bottleneck may reduce a population to a nonviable size, and the genetic diversity of the population may be simultaneously impacted by a sudden loss of alleles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%