2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reexamining the domain of hypochondriasis: Comparing the Illness Attitudes Scale to other approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean SHAI score of participants in the low health anxiety group (6.19) was below mean scores reported in non-clinical samples (e.g. 10.36 reported in Fergus & Valentiner, 2009). …”
Section: Participantscontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The mean SHAI score of participants in the low health anxiety group (6.19) was below mean scores reported in non-clinical samples (e.g. 10.36 reported in Fergus & Valentiner, 2009). …”
Section: Participantscontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Also, higher mean-level SHAI scores have been found in individuals suffering from HC relative to individuals suffering from a non-HC anxiety disorder and nonclinical controls (Abramowitz et al 2007b;Salkovskis et al 2002;Wheaton et al 2010). However, one study found the SHAI scales to be redundant with a measure of HC (i.e., the Illness Attitudes Scale) in predicting a behavioral component of the disorder (i.e., medical utilization; Fergus and Valentiner 2009). Further, the convergence of the SHAI scales with a measure that was designed to be consistent with the conceptualization of HC as health anxiety remains unexamined.…”
Section: Self-report Measures Of Health Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The affective dimension of the IAS consisted of summing nine of the items that had primary loadings on the IAS-disease phobia (i.e., fear of illness, death, disease, and pain) factor and the cognitive dimension of the IAS consisted of summing the four items that had primary loadings on the IAS-disease conviction factor (following Hadjistavropoulos, Frombach, 8c Asmundson, 1999). Both IAS scales have demonstrated adequate psychometric properties in prior studies (Fergus 8c Valentiner, 2009). The affective scale (Cronbach's a = .90) ofthe IAS demonstrated good internal consistency in this study and, given its brevity, the cognitive scale (a = .77) of the IAS demonstrated adequate internal consistency in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%