2005
DOI: 10.1080/15235882.2005.10162822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reexamining Identification and Reclassification of English Language Learners: A Critical Discussion of Select State Practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with the extant literature we reviewed (e.g., Mahoney & MacSwan, 2005), suggesting that assessments with pervasive issues may be promulgating discrepancy views of achievement among ELLs.…”
Section: Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is consistent with the extant literature we reviewed (e.g., Mahoney & MacSwan, 2005), suggesting that assessments with pervasive issues may be promulgating discrepancy views of achievement among ELLs.…”
Section: Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…One of the limitations with these assessments is that "they do not necessarily measure students' ability to use the language in real-life settings or for academic purposes" (García, McKoon, & August, 2008, p. 255). Some researchers have found these assessment practices to be more detrimental than helpful in promoting achievement among ELLs (MacSwan, 2000;MacSwan & Rolstad, 2006;Mahoney & MacSwan, 2005). MacSwan and Rolstad (2006), for example, presented native language proficiency rates of students assessed with various measures that were in stark contrast with the extant literature on language acquisition (p. 2320).…”
Section: Limited English Proficiencymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Typically, identification of language minority students begins with a home language survey, completed by the parents, indicating the use of a language other than English in the home (Mahoney & MacSwan, 2005). However, recognition of language minority status is just the first step in the LEP identification process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, when language minority youth do enroll, it is primarily in two-year, rather than four-year institutions (Desmond & Turley, 2009; Turley, 2009). Over 20% of K-12 students are language minorities, noted as a special status group in U.S. schools—flagged for linguistic assessment and identification upon enrollment (Abedi, 2008; Mahoney & MacSwan, 2005), as well as possible placement in linguistic support services.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%