2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.80.052116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reexamination of a multisetting Bell inequality for qudits

Abstract: The class of d-setting, d-outcome Bell inequalities proposed by Ji and collaborators [Phys. Rev. A 78, 052103] are reexamined. For every positive integer d > 2, we show that the corresponding non-trivial Bell inequality for probabilities provides the maximum classical winning probability of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt-like game with d inputs and d outputs. We also demonstrate that the general classical upper bounds given by Ji et al. are underestimated, which invalidates many of the corresponding correlatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An equivalent inequality with the same properties was found in Refs. [32,33]. We can apply the same strategy for four qutrits starting with the GHZ state |GHZ 3 4 = (|0000 + |1111 + |2222 )/ √ 3.…”
Section: A Bell Inequalities From Entangled Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An equivalent inequality with the same properties was found in Refs. [32,33]. We can apply the same strategy for four qutrits starting with the GHZ state |GHZ 3 4 = (|0000 + |1111 + |2222 )/ √ 3.…”
Section: A Bell Inequalities From Entangled Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is done the same way as in our previous method [13]. An algorithm applying this very third step has been also used by Liang et al [29] to compute quantum optima for multiple-outcome Bell expressions. From Eq.…”
Section: The Iterative Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(27) Notice that this Bell inequality separates L from Q as it is straightforward to find that the maximal value of G(Φ can be found in [35].…”
Section: Tsirelson Bounds and Bipartite Maximally Entangled Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%