1987
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0104(87)80041-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reevaluation of electronic polarization energies in organic molecular crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
90
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
10
90
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the gas-phase molecule, the ionization energy is 6.6 eV (Ref. 33) and E t = 5.2 eV, 34 the pentacene mid-gap is located 1.2 eV above the metal work-function. (b) In a LDA-DFT (or GGA-DFT) approach, the KohnSham energy gap is too small (see Eq.…”
Section: A Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the gas-phase molecule, the ionization energy is 6.6 eV (Ref. 33) and E t = 5.2 eV, 34 the pentacene mid-gap is located 1.2 eV above the metal work-function. (b) In a LDA-DFT (or GGA-DFT) approach, the KohnSham energy gap is too small (see Eq.…”
Section: A Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1)); in the gas-phase pentacene, E KS = 1.1 eV (1.6 eV in our basis set) and E t = 5.2 eV. 34 For pentacene on Au(111), E t is reduced due to surface polarization effects; we determine E t analyzing the case of a single molecule on the surface. In our approach, we first obtain U by means of the equation: U = eV IDIS /n, 23 calculations (see Sec.…”
Section: A Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have been a number of studies to determine the polarization energy due to a positive charge in pentacene, 35,[50][51][52][53] evaluations of the polarization energy in C 60 due to a positive or negative 60 ,C P + is 1.1 -1.4 eV; by comparison to available gas-phase electron affinity (EA) data, 60 ,C P − is in the range 1.4 -1.6 eV, that is, it is either equal to, or greater by up to 0.5 eV than 60 ,C P + . These numbers suggest that 60 , which is opposite to the trend observed for the unsubstituted linear oligoacenes,…”
Section: Bulk Polarization Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentally, if we take for the polarization energy due to a negative charge carrier on a C 60 molecule ( 60 ,C P − ) the value of 1.4 eV at which 60 60 , , 51,54 there is an estimated difference of about 0.2 eV with the polarization energy due to a positive charge carrier in pentacene ( , 5 …”
Section: Bulk Polarization Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to make sure that the conclusions pertain to a physically relevant situation, we have used the input data corresponding to the anthracene crystal which was the standard testing case for previous theories [1,2,7,8,[14][15][16][17][18] They are essentially the same as in the most recent paper on anthracene [18]. In view of the continuing discussion in the literature [3,4,[15][16][17][18][19] it was • not clear whether the band gap EG = 4.42 eV or EG = 4.25 eV would be appropriate for the anthracene crystal. Due to the model nature of the present paper, this issue is of secondary importance here.…”
Section: Implementation and Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%