2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reef manta ray social dynamics depend on individual differences in behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found quantitative differences in levels of polarization and leadership, providing evidence for distinct collective behaviour states. Our research suggests that these states occur interchangeably as individuals make active decisions to aggregate and interact socially (Perryman et al 2019, 2022). This is likely driven by local social and environmental conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found quantitative differences in levels of polarization and leadership, providing evidence for distinct collective behaviour states. Our research suggests that these states occur interchangeably as individuals make active decisions to aggregate and interact socially (Perryman et al 2019, 2022). This is likely driven by local social and environmental conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The area is well protected from illegal fishing, but tourism has increased substantially in the past decade (Andradi-Brown et al 2021). Reef mantas in Raja Ampat maintain social relationships that are linked to habitat preferences, sex-based assortment and fission-fusion dynamics (Perryman et al 2019; Perryman et al 2022). They frequent feeding sites and cleaning ‘stations’ which are focal points for social and courtship behaviours (Marshall & Bennett 2010; Stevens 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an infinite island model, only a few migrants per generation are required to obscure strong population structure when N e is large (Wright, 1931) and therefore it is possible the patterns we observe translate to infrequent dispersal events. Furthermore, dispersal could be segregated by age and/or sex (McClain et al, 2022; Phillips et al, 2021), and may vary among individuals (Papastamatiou et al, 2013; Perryman et al, 2022; Thorburn et al, 2019). While challenging, there is benefit in extending future tagging efforts to transient individuals away from known aggregation sites (Garzon et al, 2023), as well as previously underrepresented age classes – such as juveniles – to capture what may be infrequent yet evolutionarily relevant movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intriguingly, the social relationships between Port Jackson sharks at breeding aggregation sites not only determine the time at which they depart on their southerly migration but also predict when they will arrive the following season (Pelizza et al unpublished data). Social network analysis of a manta ray population in West Papua based on individual identification using unique spots as well as acoustic tags has also shown that the social relationships between these animals is far more complex than previously believed (Perryman et al 2019 , 2022 ). Using a similar approach for black tip reef sharks in French Polynesia, Mourier et al ( 2017b ) interrogated the social network to see how robust it was to fishing pressure.…”
Section: Social Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%