Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
This Innovative Practice Full Paper explores the emergence of a number of innovative new models for engineering education around the world in recent years. These models offer valuable insights for the engineering education community; however, the transferability of these insights to established programs has been hampered by misconceptions around their contexts.Many of these new models have been established on greenfield sites that had not previously offered engineering degrees. The flexibility offered by working on a blank page has contributed to the success of these programs; however, it also fosters the misconception that this success is not transferrable to other institutions that already offer engineering degrees.Examples of such programs are viewed through the lens of Doblin's Ten Types of Innovation. Launching a successful and sustainable new engineering program ultimately requires most, if not all, of the ten types of innovation at different stages of the implementation. This paper will show the impact of the blank page context on the ten types of innovation. Some types of innovation (such as novel program structures) are made easier because of the absence of existing structures. This flexibility comes at the cost of greater difficulty in other types of innovation (such as implementing quality assurance) that comes from not having existing structures. Ultimately, the paper will show that the success of these programs is not due to their working on a blank page, but rather due to their adopting multiple dimensions from the Doblin framework, and their ability to adapt those innovations to the affordances offered by a greenfield environment.We conclude by extending the model to show some examples of non-blank pages where substantial innovation has worked. The lessons demonstrated in the paper will guide engineering education innovators to focus on the kinds of innovation required, rather than the context in which they operate.
This Innovative Practice Full Paper explores the emergence of a number of innovative new models for engineering education around the world in recent years. These models offer valuable insights for the engineering education community; however, the transferability of these insights to established programs has been hampered by misconceptions around their contexts.Many of these new models have been established on greenfield sites that had not previously offered engineering degrees. The flexibility offered by working on a blank page has contributed to the success of these programs; however, it also fosters the misconception that this success is not transferrable to other institutions that already offer engineering degrees.Examples of such programs are viewed through the lens of Doblin's Ten Types of Innovation. Launching a successful and sustainable new engineering program ultimately requires most, if not all, of the ten types of innovation at different stages of the implementation. This paper will show the impact of the blank page context on the ten types of innovation. Some types of innovation (such as novel program structures) are made easier because of the absence of existing structures. This flexibility comes at the cost of greater difficulty in other types of innovation (such as implementing quality assurance) that comes from not having existing structures. Ultimately, the paper will show that the success of these programs is not due to their working on a blank page, but rather due to their adopting multiple dimensions from the Doblin framework, and their ability to adapt those innovations to the affordances offered by a greenfield environment.We conclude by extending the model to show some examples of non-blank pages where substantial innovation has worked. The lessons demonstrated in the paper will guide engineering education innovators to focus on the kinds of innovation required, rather than the context in which they operate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.