2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-3203(02)00103-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redundant versus orthogonal wavelet decomposition for multisensor image fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 and in addition, some soft tissue present in the CT scan is not seen in the MRI image provided. In contrast, the MRI image [7] uses image brightness to indicate the amount of hydrogen atoms present in the soft tissue thus, the brightness of soft tissue is higher and bones can no longer been seen. There is complementary information present within these images however and to illustrate this we use three methods of fusion that have already been discussed in context of medical imaging and adopt the same fusion standards used in our IDFCT method.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 and in addition, some soft tissue present in the CT scan is not seen in the MRI image provided. In contrast, the MRI image [7] uses image brightness to indicate the amount of hydrogen atoms present in the soft tissue thus, the brightness of soft tissue is higher and bones can no longer been seen. There is complementary information present within these images however and to illustrate this we use three methods of fusion that have already been discussed in context of medical imaging and adopt the same fusion standards used in our IDFCT method.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar problem of deconvolution is faced in spectroscopy, where the entire emission spectrum is collected (42)(43)(44)(45). Consequently, several mathematical deconvolution techniques have been developed to separate backgrounds and discrete spectral components (46)(47)(48). Some algorithms have even shown success at separating signal components with little or no a priori information about the sample (49,50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many methods discovered and discussed in literature that focus on image fusion. They vary with the aim of application used, but they can be mainly categorized due to algorithms used into pyramid techniques [10,11], morphological methods [3,4,5], discrete wavelet transform [12,13,14] and neural network fusion [15]. The different classification of image fusion involves pixel, feature and symbolic levels [16].…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%