2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redundancy and divergence in the amyloid precursor protein family

Abstract: a b s t r a c tGene duplication provides genetic material required for functional diversification. An interesting example is the amyloid precursor protein (APP) protein family. The APP gene family has experienced both expansion and contraction during evolution. The three mammalian members have been studied quite extensively in combined knock out models. The underlying assumption is that APP, amyloid precursor like protein 1 and 2 (APLP1, APLP2) are functionally redundant. This assumption is primarily supported… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
78
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
6
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prokaryotes, plants, and yeasts do not appear to possess members of the APP family of proteins. The evolutionary appearance of the APP family of proteins therefore seems to coincide with the evolution of the earliest nervous systems with functioning synapses (Shariati and De Strooper, 2013) but also coincides with other events such as the appearance of lipoprotein receptors (Dieckmann et al, 2010). Based on direct sequence comparisons of the three human APP family members, APLP1 may be the closest human homolog of the invertebrate APP-like proteins (APL-1 and APPL) (Joshi et al, 2009); however, evolutionary relationships are difficult to interpret as the APP family of genes has undergone multiple duplication events and development of different splice variants.…”
Section: Clues From Evolution: Structure Of App and Its Relatives Acrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prokaryotes, plants, and yeasts do not appear to possess members of the APP family of proteins. The evolutionary appearance of the APP family of proteins therefore seems to coincide with the evolution of the earliest nervous systems with functioning synapses (Shariati and De Strooper, 2013) but also coincides with other events such as the appearance of lipoprotein receptors (Dieckmann et al, 2010). Based on direct sequence comparisons of the three human APP family members, APLP1 may be the closest human homolog of the invertebrate APP-like proteins (APL-1 and APPL) (Joshi et al, 2009); however, evolutionary relationships are difficult to interpret as the APP family of genes has undergone multiple duplication events and development of different splice variants.…”
Section: Clues From Evolution: Structure Of App and Its Relatives Acrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding could indicate functional redundancy where APLP2 can take over for both APP and APLP1 functions, whereas APP or APLP1 alone cannot compensate for the loss of the other two family members. Although the functions of APP, APLP1, and APLP2 may substantially overlap, it remains formally possible that APP paralogues have unrelated nonredundant functions where the net effect of the loss of different pathways leads to lethality in double-knockout mice (Shariati and De Strooper, 2013). Relevant in this context is the observation that APLP1 and APLP2 levels are not upregulated in APP knockout mice (Zheng et al, 1995); APP, APLP1, and APLP2 have different tissue distributions, and proteins that interact within the ectodomains of APP, APLP1, and APLP2 overlap only modestly (Bai et al, 2008).…”
Section: Possible Functions Of App Family Members In Brain Developmenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manipulations of A␤ production may thus have deleterious effects upon HS function in the nucleus. The present findings may also contribute to an understanding of the physiological function of APP, which is still incomplete (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Expression divergence is often observed among paralogous gene pairs that can be due to modification of regulatory elements during evolution (Shariati and De Strooper, 2013), and likely results in function diversification (Stern and Orgogozo, 2008). To evaluate the degree of expression divergence, we compared the expression profiles of the four paralogous pairs.…”
Section: Distinct Expression Patterns Among Bcaa Catabolic Enzyme Parmentioning
confidence: 99%