The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2022.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reductive biomining of pyrite by methanogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the mica schist, sulfur occurs mainly in pyrrhotite [Fe (1–x) S] and more rarely in pyrite (FeS 2 ) and chalcopyrite (CuFeS 2 ) ( Västi, 2011 ). Moreover, sulfides in rocks may be leached by the saline groundwater (Na + and Cl – ), oxidized in anoxic conditions abiotically with ferric iron Fe (III) or by microorganisms, and released as sulfate or other intermediate sulfur species ( Müller and Regenspurg, 2017 ; Jakus et al, 2021 ; Bao et al, 2022 ), which is evident in the recent reviews on sulfide mineral–microbe interactions ( Bomberg et al, 2021 ; Ortiz-Castillo et al, 2021 ; Spietz et al, 2022 ). Rock surface biofilms could potentially facilitate interactions in the necessary cycling processes between different groups of microorganisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mica schist, sulfur occurs mainly in pyrrhotite [Fe (1–x) S] and more rarely in pyrite (FeS 2 ) and chalcopyrite (CuFeS 2 ) ( Västi, 2011 ). Moreover, sulfides in rocks may be leached by the saline groundwater (Na + and Cl – ), oxidized in anoxic conditions abiotically with ferric iron Fe (III) or by microorganisms, and released as sulfate or other intermediate sulfur species ( Müller and Regenspurg, 2017 ; Jakus et al, 2021 ; Bao et al, 2022 ), which is evident in the recent reviews on sulfide mineral–microbe interactions ( Bomberg et al, 2021 ; Ortiz-Castillo et al, 2021 ; Spietz et al, 2022 ). Rock surface biofilms could potentially facilitate interactions in the necessary cycling processes between different groups of microorganisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent assimilation of FeS (aq) by anaerobic methanogens also provides a new avenue to explore how [Fe–S] biocatalysts may have originated from iron–sulfide mineral catalysts. FeS (aq) show a strong resemblance in their structure and composition to [Fe–S] clusters found in proteins (Figure 1; Boyd, Schut, Broderick, et al, 2014c; Rickard & Luther, 2007; Spietz, Payne, Szilagyi, & Boyd, 2022a). The same is true for other iron sulfide minerals (e.g., FeS (mack) , Fe 3 S 4 ) and the metal‐cofactors that form the active sites of metalloenzymes (Boyd, Schut, Broderick, et al, 2014c; Russell & Martin, 2004).…”
Section: Iron Sulfur‐based Metallocofactorsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Like the aforementioned minerals, [Fe–S] enzymes like hydrogenase, nitrogenase, and CO dehydrogenase also catalyse transformations of H 2 , N 2 , CO/CO 2 , respectively, at active sites that contain modified [Fe–S] metal cofactors. Parallels in the composition and reactivity of abiotic iron–sulfide minerals and the [Fe–S] centres of metalloenzymes that catalyse such reactions raise the intriguing question of whether enzymes were originally templated by mineral‐based precursors (Boyd, Schut, Broderick, et al, 2014c; Russell & Martin, 2004; Spietz, Payne, Szilagyi, & Boyd, 2022a).…”
Section: Iron Sulfur‐based Metallocofactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the latter, methanogens as anaerobic archaea generating methane via metabolism of carbon dioxide, alcohols, and organic acids, 7 were also shown to reduce FeS 2(p) 8–13 . The insoluble nature of FeS 2(p) indicates 14 that reduction by methanogens takes place extracellularly either via direct contact with the mineral surface to catalyze reduction 15 or with the asistance of soluble redox shuttles for long range reduction, such as quinone analogs (i.e., anthraquinone‐2,6‐disulfonate) 16 . Mineral reduction by methanogens does not appear to be energy‐yielding and rather is carried out to generate bioavailable Fe and S in order to meet the cells' biosynthetic demands for these elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%