2020
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2019.2955627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of Three-Phase Transformer Inrush Currents Using Controlled Switching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…𝐿 is variable in nature and is estimated from the fluxmagnetizing current slope, resulting in a very low inductance value in saturation region, and consequently very high magnetizing current. Assuming negligible 𝐿 and very high 𝑅 values for simplification, and considering that the secondary side is open-circuit during energization, the core flux 𝜙 can be estimated as in Equation ( 8) from [34], where 𝜙 is the residual core flux following previous de-energization, and 𝛼 is the voltage angle at the energization instant. as in Equation ( 8) from [34], where φ r is the residual core flux following previous deenergization, and α is the voltage angle at the energization instant.…”
Section: Black-start/ac Synchronization Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…𝐿 is variable in nature and is estimated from the fluxmagnetizing current slope, resulting in a very low inductance value in saturation region, and consequently very high magnetizing current. Assuming negligible 𝐿 and very high 𝑅 values for simplification, and considering that the secondary side is open-circuit during energization, the core flux 𝜙 can be estimated as in Equation ( 8) from [34], where 𝜙 is the residual core flux following previous de-energization, and 𝛼 is the voltage angle at the energization instant. as in Equation ( 8) from [34], where φ r is the residual core flux following previous deenergization, and α is the voltage angle at the energization instant.…”
Section: Black-start/ac Synchronization Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming negligible 𝐿 and very high 𝑅 values for simplification, and considering that the secondary side is open-circuit during energization, the core flux 𝜙 can be estimated as in Equation ( 8) from [34], where 𝜙 is the residual core flux following previous de-energization, and 𝛼 is the voltage angle at the energization instant. as in Equation ( 8) from [34], where φ r is the residual core flux following previous deenergization, and α is the voltage angle at the energization instant.…”
Section: Black-start/ac Synchronization Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] calculated the impulse current and torque generated by PSE, and defined the conditions under which the system can sustain the PSE impulse, and proposed split-phase control can suppress the impulse to a certain extent. At present, there are many different phase control methods have been proposed to suppress the impulse current caused by component access or removal, such as that for the reduction of the impulse current of a three-phase transformer [14][15][16][17][18]. However, there is still no physics or experiment to prove which phase control method is the best to suppress the impulse of PSE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes this current may be 6 to 8 times higher than the rated state current [9], which will result the transformer failing to connect with the power grid. To suppress inrush current, synchronous closing technology and phase selection closing technology are proposed in [10]- [12], on the premise of Br magnitude and direction being obtained [13]. Moreover, demagnetization without knowing the magnitude of Br in the transformer core is not only time consuming and laborious, but also has a poor demagnetization effect [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%