2020
DOI: 10.7566/jpsj.89.034712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of the 17O Knight Shift in the Superconducting State and the Heat-up Effect by NMR Pulses on Sr2RuO4

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

15
116
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
15
116
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The first candidate chiral p-wave superconductor is Sr 2 RuO 4 evidenced by previous NMR measurements 8,9 , which breaks the time-reversal symmetry 10 . However, a recent NMR measurement contradicts the previous finding ascribing to the heat-up effect in Knight shift in the NMR experiments 11,12 .…”
contrasting
confidence: 81%
“…The first candidate chiral p-wave superconductor is Sr 2 RuO 4 evidenced by previous NMR measurements 8,9 , which breaks the time-reversal symmetry 10 . However, a recent NMR measurement contradicts the previous finding ascribing to the heat-up effect in Knight shift in the NMR experiments 11,12 .…”
contrasting
confidence: 81%
“…The evidence of a two-component SC order parameter 16,17 is difficult to reconcile with the lack of singular T c dependence on symmetry breaking strain 18 or in-plane magnetic field 19 . The evidence of triplet (odd parity 20 ) pairing is difficult to reconcile with the evidence of singlet pairing from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) 21,22 and from the fact that the in-plane critical field appears to be Pauli-limited 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In view of the Knight-shift experiments [31,32], it is important to comment on the spin susceptibility associated with the dominant E g { [6,3], − [5,3]} channel. Since it is a spin-triplet state with in-plane spin polarization of the Copper pairs, similar to the familiar chiral p-wave spin-triplet pairing with a d vector along the k z direction, it might naively be expected to show a temperature-independent spin susceptibility for inplane fields.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%