Reduction of the rate of hospitalization in patients with acute coronary syndrome: An action research

Dorri, Safoura; Farahani, Mansoureh Ashghali; Mohammadebrahimi, Hossein; Shahraki, S.; Hakimi, Hamideh

doi:10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_219_19

Cited by 2 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of these, 5738 articles were excluded based on the review of the title and abstract, and the full text was obtained for the remaining 154 articles. Based on the authors' assessment, 22 unique studies 28–49 published across 45 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review (Figure 1).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the 22 included studies, 16 utilized a mixed‐method approach 28‐30,32,34,35,38,39,41‐45,47‐49 and six were qualitative 31,33,36,37,40,46 . Only one study had been published before the year 2010, 39 while the rest were published between 2014 and 2022.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One study undertaken in a hospital setting 38 involved meeting with hospital management staff to identify key services and/or staff who could act as champions for the co‐design process. One study 33 engaged nurses and nurse managers of the cardiac care unit via several informal meetings throughout the co‐design process to identify ways to address readmissions.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the 22 included studies, 16 utilized a mixed-method approach [28][29][30]32,34,35,38,39,[41][42][43][44][45][47][48][49] and six were qualitative. 31,33,36,37,40,46 Only one study had been published before the year 2010, 39 while the rest were published between 2014 and 2022. Multiple geographical settings were represented with the majority of studies from Australia (n = 7) and the United States (n = 4), and two studies each from the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom.…”

Section: Study and Participant Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most common approach used in the planning phase was organizing stakeholder/expert or community advisory board meetings utilized in eight studies. 31,37,38,42,[46][47][48][49] Group discussions/focus groups with participants were used in six studies 30,34,36,41,43,44 ; and four studies 28,33,35,45 ran ideas/brainstorming workshops to generate ideas/goals and devise plans on how to achieve them.…”

Section: Step 2: Planmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Use of co‐design methodology in the development of cardiovascular disease secondary prevention interventions: A scoping review

Talevski

Kulnik

Jessup

et al. 2022

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction There is growing evidence to support the use of co‐design in developing interventions across many disciplines. This scoping review aims to examine how co‐design methodology has been used in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) secondary prevention interventions within health and community settings. Methods We searched four academic databases for studies that used the co‐design approach to develop their intervention. Studies were included if consumers (adults with CVD) and key stakeholders (e.g. clinicians, service providers) were involved in the co‐design process. The review focused on methodology rather than traditional study outcomes; therefore, co‐design processes and activities were extracted and evaluated against a selected co‐design framework. Results Twenty‐two studies were included in this review. Studies were implemented across various settings with consumers and stakeholder groups most frequently consisting of patients and healthcare professionals, respectively. Most studies specifically stated that they used a ‘co‐design’ approach ( n = 10); others used terms such as participatory action research ( n = 3), user‐centred design ( n = 3) and community‐based participatory research ( n = 2). Although there was variability in terminology, co‐design processes, and participants, all studies adhered to the key principles of consumer engagement. Predominant co‐design activities included semistructured interviews, focus groups, co‐design/development workshops and advisory group meetings. Intervention effectiveness was assessed in eight studies showing mixed results. Conclusions This review provides an overview of how the co‐design approach has previously been used in the development of CVD secondary prevention interventions. These findings provide methodological considerations that can guide researchers and healthcare services when implementing co‐design to develop feasible and acceptable interventions that can improve outcomes for CVD populations. Patient or Public Contribution No patients, service users, caregivers, people with lived experience or members of the public were involved in this scoping review. This review article was written by academics who have undertaken a significant amount of co‐design work with consumers and stakeholders.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study and Participant Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Step 2: Planmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Use of co‐design methodology in the development of cardiovascular disease secondary prevention interventions: A scoping review

Talevski

Kulnik

Jessup

et al. 2022

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The relationship of family functioning and family health with hospital readmission in patients with heart failure: insights from an international cross-sectional study

Shamali

Østergaard

Svavarsdóttir

et al. 2022

European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The growing hospital readmission rate among patients with heart failure (HF) has imposed a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems. Therefore, it is essential to identify readmission associating factors to reduce hospital readmission. Aims This study aimed to investigate the relationship of family functioning and family health with hospital readmission rates over six months in patients with HF and identify the sociodemographic and/or clinical variables associated with hospital readmission. Methods This international multicentre cross-sectional study involved a sample of 692 patients with HF from three countries (Denmark 312, Iran 288, and Iceland 92) recruited from January 2015 to May 2020. The Family Functioning, Health, and Social Support questionnaire was used to collect the data. The number of patients’ hospital readmissions during the six-month period was retrieved from patients’ hospital records. Results Of the total sample, 184 (26.6%) patients were readmitted during the six-month period. Of these, 111 (16%) had one readmission, 68 (9.9%) had two readmissions, and 5 (0.7%) had three readmissions. Family functioning, family health, being unemployed, and country of residence were significant factors associated with hospital readmission for the patients. Conclusion This study highlights the critical roles of family functioning and family health in six-month hospital readmission among patients with HF. Moreover, the strategy of healthcare systems in the management of HF is a key determinant that influences hospital readmission. Our findings may assist the investigation of potential strategies to reduce hospital readmission in patients with HF.

show abstract

Reduction of the rate of hospitalization in patients with acute coronary syndrome: An action research

Cited by 2 publications

References 20 publications

Use of co‐design methodology in the development of cardiovascular disease secondary prevention interventions: A scoping review

Use of co‐design methodology in the development of cardiovascular disease secondary prevention interventions: A scoping review

The relationship of family functioning and family health with hospital readmission in patients with heart failure: insights from an international cross-sectional study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About