2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2012
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2012.6346539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of the effect of arm position variation on real-time performance of motion classification

Abstract: A couple of studies have been conducted with able-bodied subjects and/or arm amputees to investigate the impact of arm position changes in the practical use of a multifunctional myoelectric prosthesis. The classification accuracy calculated offline from electromyography (EMG) recordings was used as a performance metric in these studies, which is not a true measure of real-time control performance. In this study, the influence of arm position changes on the real-time performance of EMG pattern recognition (EMG-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four of the six sensors were mounted on the remaining arm evenly around the apex of the muscle bulge, 1-2 cm distal to the elbow crease, and another two were placed on the distal end over the flexor muscle and extensor muscle, respectively, as shown in Figure 1. Five arm positions that varied in the sagittal plane and seven classes of forearm movements, which might be commonly involved in daily life activities [23], were considered in the study. The arm positions are as follows:

  P1: straight arm reaching forward (horizontal)

  P2: arm hanging at side, elbow bent at 135°

  P3: arm hanging at side, elbow bent at 90°

  P4: arm hanging at side, elbow bent at 45°

  P5: straight arm hanging at side

…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Four of the six sensors were mounted on the remaining arm evenly around the apex of the muscle bulge, 1-2 cm distal to the elbow crease, and another two were placed on the distal end over the flexor muscle and extensor muscle, respectively, as shown in Figure 1. Five arm positions that varied in the sagittal plane and seven classes of forearm movements, which might be commonly involved in daily life activities [23], were considered in the study. The arm positions are as follows:

  P1: straight arm reaching forward (horizontal)

  P2: arm hanging at side, elbow bent at 135°

  P3: arm hanging at side, elbow bent at 90°

  P4: arm hanging at side, elbow bent at 45°

  P5: straight arm hanging at side

…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a motion-test environment (MTE) developed using MATLAB programing tool [23], each subject was asked to follow a prompt that displays the arm position images in which the seven forearm movements are performed with a moderate muscle contraction force. Each movement was sustained for 4 seconds and repeated twice, resulting in 8-second hybrid signal recordings (EMG and ACC) per motion class in every arm position.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations