2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07006-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of respiratory motion artifacts in gadoxetate-enhanced MR with a deep learning–based filter using convolutional neural network

Abstract: Objectives To reveal the utility of motion artifact reduction with convolutional neural network (MARC) in gadoxetate disodium–enhanced multi-arterial phase MRI of the liver. Methods This retrospective study included 192 patients (131 men, 68.7 ± 10.3 years) receiving gadoxetate disodium–enhanced liver MRI in 2017. Datasets were submitted to a newly developed filter (MARC), consisting of 7 convolutional layers, and trained on 14,190 cropped images generated from abdominal MR images. Motion artifact for traini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially not possible for contrast enhanced acquisitions. Kromrey et al added periodic phase errors to K-space lines to simulate periodic respiratory motion artifacts in abdomen MRI (20). Tamada et al used random phase error patterns to simulate more-severe, non-periodic motion (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is especially not possible for contrast enhanced acquisitions. Kromrey et al added periodic phase errors to K-space lines to simulate periodic respiratory motion artifacts in abdomen MRI (20). Tamada et al used random phase error patterns to simulate more-severe, non-periodic motion (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies were focused on motion artifact reduction in DCE-MRI of the liver (19,20) and used the motion artifact reduction with convolutional (MARC) network with the pixel-by-pixel MSE as the loss function in their models. Although these methods achieved relatively good denoising effect on the liver MRIs, Yang et al mentioned that using the pixel-by-pixel MSE as the loss function would lead to over-smoothing problems so that perceptually-important details were likely to be overlooked (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The noise, sharpness and artifacts were not statistically different between DL T2W and non-cartesian T2W [ 62 ]. DL was also used to reduce respiratory artifacts, and this led to an increase of liver lesion conspicuousness without removing anatomical details [ 63 ]. DL applied to MR may reduce acquisition time and improve image quality.…”
Section: Reconstruction and Image Quality Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%