2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of radiation exposure and improvement of image quality with BMI-adapted prospective cardiac computed tomography and iterative reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, IR in combination with an edge-enhancing reconstruction algorithm (i. e. XCB) and "multi-resolution" represents an ideal combination, as high spatial resolution can be combined with a reduction in image noise while preserving an easy-to-adapt image appearance. The results of our study are in good agreement with those from a similar study performed with the iDose prototype, which, however, was restricted to a maximum iDose level of 5 and the use of the XCB kernel only [32]. As a prototype that was not approved as a medical device was used at the point in time when this study was conducted, only the influence of increasing IR levels on image quality at a constant dose could be investigated.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Thus, IR in combination with an edge-enhancing reconstruction algorithm (i. e. XCB) and "multi-resolution" represents an ideal combination, as high spatial resolution can be combined with a reduction in image noise while preserving an easy-to-adapt image appearance. The results of our study are in good agreement with those from a similar study performed with the iDose prototype, which, however, was restricted to a maximum iDose level of 5 and the use of the XCB kernel only [32]. As a prototype that was not approved as a medical device was used at the point in time when this study was conducted, only the influence of increasing IR levels on image quality at a constant dose could be investigated.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Along with other dosereduction strategies, IRT allows the user to achieve a balance among radiation dose, spatial and contrast resolutions, and noise. With the same radiation dose used in FBP, IRT can maintain or improve resolution while reducing noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiation exposure was relatively high but in the upper range of the recently published PROTECTION I trial and other recently published studies using dual-source CCT [20,37]. In future studies, and according to recent reports the radiation exposure can be reduced markedly by using lowtube voltage (100 kV) acquisitions, BMI-adapted tube current and iterative reconstruction algorithms [38,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%