Summary: The efficiency of communication between junior hospital doctors and 77 general surgical patients was assessed by using standardized questionnaires before and after the doctor/patient interview on both the patient and the house doctor. Patients were better informed about their illness than their surgery, and doctors wrongly estimated patients' knowledge in 41% of cases. Self-reported preoperative anxiety of patients was low and was estimated wrongly by house doctors in 58% of cases. In 52% of cases house doctors were considered by patients to be the most important source of information, but patients had little comprehension of the seniority of other doctors. Although 60% of patients were satisfied with the communication, the majority complained of lack of information concerning convalescence, postoperative pain and routine ward procedures.
IntroductionDespite major advancements in medical knowledge and technology, difficulties of communication remain a serious problem. Research into communication in medicine suggests that the failure to resolve these difficulties can be partly attributed to doctors (Pellegrino 1976, Francis et al. 1969, Reinhard 1974. The medical profession appears to be content with its ability to communicate with patients and seems unaware of existing problems.Numerous studies have highlighted the benefits for doctors and patients which can be attained by improving communication (Reading 1979, Schmitt & Wooldridge 1973, Langer et al. 1975. In surgery, it has been suggested that effective communication can reduce postoperative complications and analgesic requirements, thus effecting earlier discharge. This study was undertaken to evaluate communication in a surgical setting and to assess the satisfaction of doctors and patients with the present level of communication.