Reduction of power consumption at mobile station in multi-hop networks in mobile environments

Efficient strategies to reduce power consumption in MANETs

“…For the above-mentioned theory, simulations were performed by considering different parameters and the outcomes demonstrate that DYMO as the proficient power-aware routing protocol. Apart from that, a correlation was made between the simulation results presented in Jain (2012) and case 2 where Power Saving Mode is administered, it was concluded that Power Saving Mode additionally brings up the considerable power saving Figure 11 Average of residue power of mobile nodes using 802.16 for 300 min. A graphical representation of average residue power for architecture with and without relay node; the green bars represents average service life of strategy that made use of IEEE 802.16, whereas the yellow bars represents existing system strategy i.e., simply making use of IEEE 802.11 for 300 minutes of simulation time.…”

“…User-defined energy model allows the user to specify the amount of energy that can be utilized for each of the above-mentioned modes, such that the power utilization are below mentioned with the threshold level so as to prevent the network from early exhaustion. On comparing the average of the service life obtained in (Jain, 2012) for 100, 200 and 300 min and the average of the service life obtained in case 2 scenario for simulation time 100, 200 and 300 min, it can be estimated that PSM proves to be efficient. The comparison for the values generated in (Jain, 2012) and case 2 scenario can be depicted from Figs.…”

“…On comparing the average of the service life obtained in (Jain, 2012) for 100, 200 and 300 min and the average of the service life obtained in case 2 scenario for simulation time 100, 200 and 300 min, it can be estimated that PSM proves to be efficient. The comparison for the values generated in (Jain, 2012) and case 2 scenario can be depicted from Figs. 6, 7 and 8 The service life of batteries is assessed utilizing Eqs.…”

“…(1), (2) and (3) and is captured in Table 6. The total residue provided by case 2 scenario for simulation time 100, 200 and 300 min is 32.941, 29.9423, and 28.203 dBm where as the total residue provided in (Jain, 2012) for simulation time 100, 200 and 300 min is 7.49, 7.90 and 9.38 dBm.…”

“…In this section, the simulations are performed using energy model parameters, battery model parameters, IEEE 802.16, and DYMO routing protocol for 100, 200 and 300 min on both architectures i.e., architecture with relay node and architecture without relay node. After performing the simulation, the estimations of the average of the residual of battery in mAh for every mobile station for case 3 scenario and the average of the residue in (Jain, 2012) are captured, and a comparative assessment is given in Fig. 9 for the duration of 100 min, for 200 min in Fig.…”