2001
DOI: 10.1109/77.919433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of non-periodic environmental magnetic noise in MEG measurement by continuously adjusted least squares method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
121
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data for the main (interaural correlation) experiment were acquired continuously with a sampling rate of 1 kHz, filtered in hardware between 1 and 200 Hz, with a notch at 60 Hz (to remove line noise), and stored for later analysis. Effects of environmental magnetic fields were reduced based on several sensors distant from the head using the continuously adjusted least squares method (Adachi et al, 2001), and responses were then smoothed by convolution with a 39 ms Hanning window (cutoff, 55 Hz). These are standard signal processing methods; additional processing is described below.…”
Section: Neuromagnetic Recording and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for the main (interaural correlation) experiment were acquired continuously with a sampling rate of 1 kHz, filtered in hardware between 1 and 200 Hz, with a notch at 60 Hz (to remove line noise), and stored for later analysis. Effects of environmental magnetic fields were reduced based on several sensors distant from the head using the continuously adjusted least squares method (Adachi et al, 2001), and responses were then smoothed by convolution with a 39 ms Hanning window (cutoff, 55 Hz). These are standard signal processing methods; additional processing is described below.…”
Section: Neuromagnetic Recording and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involves finding a matrix C = [c kj ] such that the linear combination Cr(t) of reference signals best approximates s(t) in a least-squares sense. Several denoising methods proceed in this way, for example CALM [10]. For the second model (convolutive mixing), the previous solution does not work because a linear combination cannot effectively mimick or reverse the effects of convolutive mixing.…”
Section: Algorithms and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic responses were filtered by a bandpass filter from 0.1 to 200 Hz and digitized at a sampling rate of 1,000 Hz. For off-line analysis, the nonperiodic low-frequency noise in the MEG raw data was reduced using a continuously adjusted least-squares method (Adachi et al 2001). The resulting data were then filtered by a bandpass FIR filter from 0.5 to 50 Hz after removing artifacts with amplitudes exceeding 3,000 fT/cm in the MEG signals.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%