2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of misleading (“false”) positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. III: Sensitivity of human cell types to known genotoxic agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, four chemicals (two aneugens and two clastogens) known to induce MN, as well as one negative control chemical, were evaluated for cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. In samples not exposed to Cyt-B, increases in cytotoxicity were observed with increasing chemical dose as expected and all top doses induced a cytotoxicity of >55 6 5%, similar to results presented in published literature (7,(48)(49)(50). In samples exposed to Cyt-B however, cytotoxicity values at most doses from all chemicals tested tended to be lower than when Cyt-B was not used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, four chemicals (two aneugens and two clastogens) known to induce MN, as well as one negative control chemical, were evaluated for cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. In samples not exposed to Cyt-B, increases in cytotoxicity were observed with increasing chemical dose as expected and all top doses induced a cytotoxicity of >55 6 5%, similar to results presented in published literature (7,(48)(49)(50). In samples exposed to Cyt-B however, cytotoxicity values at most doses from all chemicals tested tended to be lower than when Cyt-B was not used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The current OECD guideline for performing the in vitro MN assay permits the use of several cell lines, both human and rodent as well as primary human or other mammalian peripheral blood lymphocytes (12). Several studies have been performed to test the in vitro MN assay using a number of different cell types including human peripheral blood lymphocytes (14,49), Chinese Hamster Ovary cells (13), Chinese Hamster Lung cells (17), and mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells (16,48,62), demonstrating positive results for many test agents. Therefore, the assay should be performed on the ISX using additional cell types and chemical agents to develop applicable sample processing methods and to demonstrate the adaptability of the method.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the data suggests that the use of human cell lines may be preferable over rodent cell lines to help reduce potential misleading positive results in in vitro assay systems with certain types of chemical (this being consistent with the observations of Fowler et al [2,31,41] who concluded that the use of a human cell type with functional p53 could reduce the detection of misleading positive results). For these investigations clear induction of micronuclei was less prevalent when using human cell lines versus mouse for this set of chemicals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Consequently, human cell lines with altered responsiveness to DNA damaging mechanisms may be expected to generate results not dissimilar to those produced in rodent cell lines. At this time there are not enough data available to reliably determine if the use of p53-competent cell lines of human origin (as opposed to p53-competent rodent derived lines) or other human cells confer greater accuracy (Walmsley & Billinton 2011;Fowler et al 2014). …”
Section: Human Versus Non-human Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%