1997
DOI: 10.1021/es960836v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of Hexavalent Chromium by Amorphous Iron Sulfide

Abstract: The reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) decreases the toxicity and mobility of chromium contaminants in soils and water. In addition, the formation of a highly insoluble Cr(III) product would decrease the likelihood of future Cr(III) re-oxidation. Amorphous iron sulfide minerals like mackinawite (FeS1 - x ) have the potential to reduce large quantities of Cr(VI) and in the process form very stable [Cr, Fe](OH)3 solids. In this study, we examine the effectiveness of amorphous FeS as a reductant of Cr(VI) by identif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
252
1
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 423 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(30 reference statements)
11
252
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The baseline subtracted height of the pre-edge peak in a given spectrum with the post-edge normalized to unity is equal to the fraction of total chromium that is present as Cr(VI), that is, the value for Cr(VI)/Cr(total) in each sample is determined directly as the baseline-subtracted height of the normalized pre-edge peak. This procedure has been previously shown to be accurate within a few percent (Patterson et al 1997;Peterson et al 1997). Because of the small differences between many of our not-aged and aged FIG.…”
Section: Sample Analysis By Xanesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The baseline subtracted height of the pre-edge peak in a given spectrum with the post-edge normalized to unity is equal to the fraction of total chromium that is present as Cr(VI), that is, the value for Cr(VI)/Cr(total) in each sample is determined directly as the baseline-subtracted height of the normalized pre-edge peak. This procedure has been previously shown to be accurate within a few percent (Patterson et al 1997;Peterson et al 1997). Because of the small differences between many of our not-aged and aged FIG.…”
Section: Sample Analysis By Xanesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Several processes have been developed to eliminate the chromium present in industrial wastewater (Singh and Prasad 2015). The most commonly used methods to reduce the concentration of Cr(VI) in aqueous solutions are ion exchange, polymer resins, coagulation-flocculation, activated carbon adsorption and the reduction/chemical precipitation/sedimentation process (Boddu et al 2003;Hu et al 2004;Patterson et al 1997). Although the last method is probably the most commonly employed, it is very inefficient because a large amount of sludge is produced and the chromium cannot be recovered from the precipitate, making this strategy very expensive (Leyva Ramos et al 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In acidic solutions, Cr 2 O 7 2-is the dominant Cr(VI) aq species, whereas in basic solutions, CrO 4 2-is dominant (49). A number of past studies have shown that Cr(VI) can be reduced to Cr(III) on such oxides via abiotic pathways (e.g., (50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)). Eary and Rai (53) reviewed some of the most commonly used abiotic reductants and their efficiencies in reducing Cr(VI) aq to Cr(III) under a range of conditions in aqueous wastes.…”
Section: E Chromium Sorption Products On Reduced Hematite and Magnetmentioning
confidence: 99%