2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of excess sludge production in sequencing batch reactor (SBR) by lysis–cryptic growth using homogenization disruption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, average Y obs in the test SBR decreased to 0.20 g SS/g SCOD at 20% recycling, to 0.14 g SS/g SCOD at 50%, and then to 0.092 g SS/g SCOD at 70% recycling. These decreases in observed sludge yield values compares favorably to those observed with other cell lysis techniques, such as high pressure homogenization (Lan et al, 2013), microwave disintegration (Wang et al, 2015), and sonication (Velho et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…On the other hand, average Y obs in the test SBR decreased to 0.20 g SS/g SCOD at 20% recycling, to 0.14 g SS/g SCOD at 50%, and then to 0.092 g SS/g SCOD at 70% recycling. These decreases in observed sludge yield values compares favorably to those observed with other cell lysis techniques, such as high pressure homogenization (Lan et al, 2013), microwave disintegration (Wang et al, 2015), and sonication (Velho et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Zuriaga-Agustí et al (2012) reported that dosing 2.5 mg chlorine dioxide/g TS in a SBR achieved 43.4% reduction in excess sludge production, while results demonstrated that this technology severely deteriorated effluent quality. Lan et al (2013) achieved a 42.4% sludge reduction in a SBR under 70 MPa disruption pressure of high-pressure-homogenization, and this lysis-cryptic growth system was found imposed negligible changes in the sludge activity. Dytczak et al (2007) combined an ozonation stage with a SBR, results found that 20% returned ozonated sludge had no negative impact on the effluent quality of the SBR process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In recent http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.009 0960-8524/Ó 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. years, sludge reduction by cell lysis-cryptic growth has aroused much public concern and interest ( Lan et al, 2013;Lin et al, 2012;Zuriaga-Agustí et al, 2012). According to the previous investigations, this technique can be realized by means of various treatment methods including thermal, microwave, alkaline, ultrasonic, and ozone oxidation pretreatments, which these pretreatments combining the existing bio-reactors (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the great operational complexity and cost of the post-treatment processes, there has been an increased focus on the use of in situ excess sludge reduction processes, as they can lower excess sludge production at the origin [2,3,4]. In this regard, different approaches of microbiological or chemical processes have been employed, such as lysis–cryptic growth [5], maintenance metabolism [6], predation on bacteria [7] and uncoupled metabolism [8,9,10]. Of these techniques, uncoupled metabolism facilitated by the addition of metabolic uncouplers has been shown to be an incredibly effective technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%