2003
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620220110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of estrogenic activity of municipal wastewater by aerated lagoon treatment facilities

Abstract: The estrogenic activity of municipal wastewater in aerated lagoon treatment facilities was evaluated using plasma concentrations of vitellogenin (Vtg) in male fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). Caged fathead minnows were exposed for 10 to 12 d in three lagoons that are connected in series at each of 10 municipal wastewater treatment facilities in central Iowa, USA, during October and November 2000. Fathead minnows held in the laboratory served as unexposed controls. Pooled (n = 4-10 fish) plasma Vtg, quant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plasma samples were thawed on ice for 2 h, and the plasma VTG level was quantified with a commercially available (Bio‐sense, Bergen, Norway) enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay following the protocol provided by the manufacturer, as previously described by Bringolf and Summerfelt [13]. Intraassay coefficient of variation was 8.5% ( n = 6), and interassay coefficient of variation was 15.1% ( n = 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plasma samples were thawed on ice for 2 h, and the plasma VTG level was quantified with a commercially available (Bio‐sense, Bergen, Norway) enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay following the protocol provided by the manufacturer, as previously described by Bringolf and Summerfelt [13]. Intraassay coefficient of variation was 8.5% ( n = 6), and interassay coefficient of variation was 15.1% ( n = 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the mid-1990s, researchers in Europe and the United States reported reproductive abnormalities, such as altered sex hormone ratios, reduced gonad size, and induction of vitellogenin (VTG) in fish exposed to environmental estrogens (EEs) [3][4][5][6]. Since then, studies worldwide have used induction of VTG, the egg yolk protein precursor, in caged and wild fish to identify surface waters containing EEs [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Although the induction of biomarkers in EE-exposed fish is well documented, only recently have studies examined the relationship of biomarkers with impairment of reproduction and development [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contaminants that mimic the female reproductive hormone estrogen were first identified in receiving waters in the United Kingdom [1,2] but have since also been identified in aquatic environments in several other European and North and South American countries [3 and references therein]. Modern sewage treatment facilities remove a large portion of the influent's estrogenic activity, reducing it by 70 to 100% from typical initial concentrations in the range of 50 to 150 ng/L [4]. Most of the removal is accomplished in secondary and tertiary treatment, with aerated lagoon treatment shown to be most effective [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern sewage treatment facilities remove a large portion of the influent's estrogenic activity, reducing it by 70 to 100% from typical initial concentrations in the range of 50 to 150 ng/L [4]. Most of the removal is accomplished in secondary and tertiary treatment, with aerated lagoon treatment shown to be most effective [3,4]. However, released wastewaters often still contain low ng/L concentrations of estrogens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular concern are the relatively high detectable levels of estrogenic EDCs in surface waters found during our fall sampling, when surface runoff would likely be less than during other times of the year (e.g., after spring crop planting and fertilization and during summer low flows). Further, point sources are also expected to have slightly higher EDC concentrations in spring than fall, when our samples were taken, because microbes that degrade waste are less efficient in cool spring temperatures [40].…”
Section: Estrogenic Edcs In Watermentioning
confidence: 99%