2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(01)00318-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of ECAL data volume using lossless data compression techniques

Abstract: We investigate the possibility of reducing the data size of the electromagnetic calorimeter(ECAL) of CMS. The Selective Readout is applied first to reduce the data size at a manageable level. Then various data compression methods are considered, and their performances are estimated using the data from the full simulation of the ECAL system. A reduction of the average event size by a factor of two or larger is obtained in most of the cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common approach is the calculation of differences between values [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. These differences may be between sampled data and a model [16] or between sampled data and a reference value (base) [17], [18] or between consecutive samples [16], [18], [19]. When dealing with signal traces, which are sampled at rates high enough that consecutive samples have values close to each other, i.e.…”
Section: Overview Of Available Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A common approach is the calculation of differences between values [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. These differences may be between sampled data and a model [16] or between sampled data and a reference value (base) [17], [18] or between consecutive samples [16], [18], [19]. When dealing with signal traces, which are sampled at rates high enough that consecutive samples have values close to each other, i.e.…”
Section: Overview Of Available Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, through a pre-processing of the incoming data, a more advantageous probability distribution can be exploited. A common approach is the calculation of differences between values [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. These differences may be between sampled data and a model [16] or between sampled data and a reference value (base) [17], [18] or between consecutive samples [16], [18], [19].…”
Section: Overview Of Available Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%