Reduction of claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: methods and design of the "CLAUSTRO" randomized controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundMagnetic resonance (MR) imaging has been described as the most important medical innovation in the last 25 years. Over 80 million MR procedures are now performed each year and on average 2.3% (95% confidence interval: 2.0 to 2.5%) of all patients scheduled for MR imaging suffer from claustrophobia. Thus, prevention of MR imaging by claustrophobia is a common problem and approximately 2,000,000 MR procedures worldwide cannot be completed due to this situation. Patients with claustrophobic anxiety are more likely to be frightened and experience a feeling of confinement or being closed in during MR imaging. In these patients, conscious sedation and additional sequences (after sedation) may be necessary to complete the examinations. Further improvements in MR design appear to be essential to alleviate this situation and broaden the applicability of MR imaging. A more open scanner configuration might help reduce claustrophobic reactions while maintaining image quality and diagnostic accuracy.Methods/DesignWe propose to analyze the rate of claustrophobic reactions, clinical utility, image quality, patient acceptance, and cost-effectiveness of an open MR scanner in a randomized comparison with a recently designed short-bore but closed scanner with 97% noise reduction. The primary aim of this study is thus to determine whether an open MR scanner can reduce claustrophobic reactions, thereby enabling more examinations of claustrophobic patients without incurring the safety issues associated with conscious sedation. In this manuscript we detail the methods and design of the prospective "CLAUSTRO" trial.DiscussionThis randomized controlled trial will be the first direct comparison of open vertical and closed short-bore MR systems in regards to claustrophobia and image quality as well as diagnostic utility.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00715806

Anxiety of Patients Undergoing CT Imaging—An Underestimated Problem?

“…A number of publications analyzed MRI-associated anxiety of patients showing that claustrophobia is a key concern with incidences of up to 65% (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). Such anxieties can become a major problem in some patients thus making repetition of MRI sequences; pharmacologic sedation (6)(7)(8)(9)(10); or other calming measures including musical entertainment (11), psychological preparation (12), and hypnosis (13) necessary. Furthermore, in a substantial number of patients, poor imaging quality due to movement artifacts (9), premature termination of scanning (1), or complete refusal of the patient to carry out MRI must be expected.…”

Clinical Surveillance Compared with Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Surveillance for Brain Metastasis: A Feasibility Survey

“…Common complaints about mri surveillance include claustrophobia and anxiety because of the narrowness of the bore, associated movement restrictions, length of the procedure, loud noise from the machine, or simply worry about the next mri [6][7][8] . To demonstrate the extent of the impact of mri on the general patient population, claustrophobia is experienced by an average of 2.3% of all patients who undergo mri (95% confidence interval: 2.0% to 2.5%), and up to 37% experience moderate-to-high levels of anticipatory anxiety [9][10][11] .…”

Cell Tracking Technologies for Acute Ischemic Brain Injury

“…60 Longer acquisition times also increase resolution, although this may be hampered by the susceptibility of patients to claustrophobia, or the length of time tolerated by an animal in the machine. 61 Should cost, time available for image acquisition, or movement of a subject be prohibitive, imageprocessing techniques can be applied postscanning. These usually rely on algorithmically combining several independent acquisitions of the same subject.…”