Reduction Mammaplasty—Variations I and II

Pontes, Ronaldo

doi:10.1097/00000637-198106000-00005

Cited by 17 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Adotamos uma classificação própria para as diversas formas mamárias e uma conduta para cada tipo específico, adotando técnicas já consagradas [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] . Tivemos pacientes com idades muito díspares, desde adolescentes, até pacientes na menopausa, no entanto, todas tinham queixas semelhantes.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mamaplastia: condutas e resultados do Serviço de Cirurgia Plástica do Hospital Regional Hans Dieter Schmidt de Joinville - SC

André

2010

Rev. Bras. Cir. Plást. (Impr.)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…As pacientes tiveram suas mamas classificadas de acordo com a classificação proposta pelo autor (Tabela 1). As técnicas cirúrgicas utilizadas seguiram essa classificação [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] . Foram excluídos do estudo, os casos indicados para mastopexia e/ou mamaplastia pós-gastroplastia.…”

Section: Métodounclassified

Mamaplastia: condutas e resultados do Serviço de Cirurgia Plástica do Hospital Regional Hans Dieter Schmidt de Joinville - SC

André

2010

Rev. Bras. Cir. Plást. (Impr.)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, breast augmentation and mastopexy are sometimes conflicting, bringing many challenges and discussions for surgeons. [ 12 13 14 15 16 ] The combination of two procedures makes the prediction of results more difficult compared with a single operation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Periareolar augmentation mastopexy: Finding the aesthetic level of breast lifting

Byun¹,

Jung²,

Shin³

et al. 2023

JCAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Ptosis and volume atrophy of the breasts are common symptoms for various ages of women and may induce a considerable amount of stress in daily life. Periareolar augmentation mastopexy is an effective procedure for such conditions, and planning the new nipple position is very important. Aim: To provide a simple, straightforward planning and walkthrough of this operation in a journey to find the ideal level of breast lifting for natural upper fullness. Materials and methods: From January 2019 to December 2021, a total of 193 patients with volume deflation and ptosis of the breast received periareolar augmentation mastopexy in our institute. We retrospectively reviewed data on demographics, surgical procedures, outcomes, and complications. Results: All operations were done with periareolar incisions, and the mean follow-up period was 29.48 ± 9.11 months. The Likert scale of outcome satisfaction scored 9.02 ± 0.61. Complications were minimal, and no symmastia or bottoming out occurred. Conclusion: We present our basic strategies of periareolar augmentation mastopexy with a slight modification of the design. We believe that lifting the nipple to 3–4 cm above the inframammary fold (IMF) (making the top of the areola about 5–6 cm above the IMF) yields satisfactory aesthetic results.

show abstract

Different Approaches for Different Breasts

Castro

Rodrigues

2005

Vertical Scar Mammaplasty

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reduction Mammaplasty—Variations I and II

Cited by 17 publications

References 0 publications

Mamaplastia: condutas e resultados do Serviço de Cirurgia Plástica do Hospital Regional Hans Dieter Schmidt de Joinville - SC

Mamaplastia: condutas e resultados do Serviço de Cirurgia Plástica do Hospital Regional Hans Dieter Schmidt de Joinville - SC

Periareolar augmentation mastopexy: Finding the aesthetic level of breast lifting

Different Approaches for Different Breasts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About