2011
DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction in Hospital Mortality Over Time in a Hospital Without a Pediatric Medical Emergency Team

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The data has been largely observational and was from before-and-after studies, which may have unaccounted or confounding variables. (13)(14)(15)(16) Joffe et al (17) demonstrated the potential for risk of bias or confounding variables by comparing the mortality rate at their institution, which did not initiate or organise a MET/RRT, with that of fi ve published studies (all reviewed by ILCOR). The reduction in mortality at Joffe et al's institution over the same time period was similar to the published results, illustrating the problems of confounding variables and contemporaneous trends.…”
Section: Medical Emergency Team/rapid Response Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data has been largely observational and was from before-and-after studies, which may have unaccounted or confounding variables. (13)(14)(15)(16) Joffe et al (17) demonstrated the potential for risk of bias or confounding variables by comparing the mortality rate at their institution, which did not initiate or organise a MET/RRT, with that of fi ve published studies (all reviewed by ILCOR). The reduction in mortality at Joffe et al's institution over the same time period was similar to the published results, illustrating the problems of confounding variables and contemporaneous trends.…”
Section: Medical Emergency Team/rapid Response Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joffe et al 26 demonstrated the potential for risk of bias or confounding variables by comparing the mortality rate at their institution, which did not initiate or organize a MET/ RRT, with 5 published studies (all reviewed here). The reduction in mortality at their institution over the same time period was similar to the published results, illustrating the problems of confounding variables and contemporaneous trends.…”
Section: Knowledge Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a challenge to evaluating RRTs is the worry that secular trends and other safety interventions may overstate the effect of RRTs. A study at a Canadian hospital without an RRT showed similar declines in mortality as observed in hospitals with RRTs [77]. Still, the level 1 evidence adds weight to the accumulating level 2-5 evidence and is sufficient to support implementation [10, 68, 78•, 79].…”
Section: Evidence For Rrtmentioning
confidence: 99%