Reduction in healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic in China

Abstract

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic caused a healthcare crisis in China and continues to wreak havoc across the world. This paper evaluated COVID-19’s impact on national and regional healthcare service utilisation and expenditure in China.MethodsUsing a big data approach, we collected data from 300 million bank card transactions to measure individual healthcare expenditure and utilisation in mainland China. Since the outbreak coincided with the 2020 Chinese Spring Festival holiday, a difference-in-difference (DID) method was employed to compare changes in healthcare utilisation before, during and after the Spring Festival in 2020 and 2019. We also tracked healthcare utilisation before, during and after the outbreak.ResultsHealthcare utilisation declined overall, especially during the post-festival period in 2020. Total healthcare expenditure and utilisation declined by 37.8% and 40.8%, respectively, while per capita expenditure increased by 3.3%. In a subgroup analysis, we found that the outbreak had a greater impact on healthcare utilisation in cities at higher risk of COVID-19, with stricter lockdown measures and those located in the western region. The DID results suggest that, compared with low-risk cities, the pandemic induced a 14.8%, 26.4% and 27.5% reduction in total healthcare expenditure in medium-risk and high-risk cities, and in cities located in Hubei province during the post-festival period in 2020 relative to 2019, an 8.6%, 15.9% and 24.4% reduction in utilisation services; and a 7.3% and 18.4% reduction in per capita expenditure in medium-risk and high-risk cities, respectively. By the last week of April 2020, as the outbreak came under control, healthcare utilisation gradually recovered, but only to 79.9%–89.3% of its pre-outbreak levels.ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic had a significantly negative effect on healthcare utilisation in China, evident by a dramatic decline in healthcare expenditure. While the utilisation level has gradually increased post-outbreak, it has yet to return to normal levels.

Dental practice closure during the first wave of COVID-19 and associated professional, practice and structural determinants: a multi-country survey

“…Dental students and interns were excluded. The sample size was calculated [23] based on previous estimates: Zhang et al [24] reported that the percent change in healthcare services utilization post epidemic ranged from 12 to 18% around the mean hypothesized to be 50%. Thus, in a best-case scenario, participants may still follow the pre-pandemic estimates (50%) or their utilization may have dropped to a worst case scenario of 12%-18%.…”

Resource utilization and outcomes in emergency general surgery during the COVID19 pandemic: An observational cost analysis

“…Outpatient care, however, appears to have experienced a similar decline as urgent/emergent consults. Healthcare in general was lost during the height of the pandemic in various parts of the world [1,20,21]. It Whether loss of healthcare for non-COVID19 patients accounts for some proportion of excess mortality observed in different countries, including Spain, where excess mortality between February and May was 38% [22], is conceivable but difficult to assess.…”

“…Apart from its direct impact on infected patients, the SARS-CoV-2/COVID19 pandemic has had indirect collateral effects on patients with other pathologies not accessing standard of care for their diseases [1,2]. Surgery is one of the most resource-intensive areas of clinical medicine [3], and patients requiring surgical interventions have been particularly vulnerable in this regard.…”

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health service utilisation in Sierra Leone

“…A prospective observational study from Nepal reported facility-based deliveries reduced by 51.4 %, with a corresponding increase in maternal and infant mortality(11). A nationwide study in China found that total healthcare expenditure and utilisation declined by 37.8% and 40.8%, respectively during the worst phase of the outbreak(12). The impact of the pandemic on surgical services is indicated in an expert elicitation exercise involving 190 countries.…”