2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01751.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction in effluent nutrient loads from flow-through facilities for trout production: a review

Abstract: The environmental legislation on waste loadings and the public discussion on environmental issues concerning inland aquaculture facilities have become stronger in recent years. An end of the discussion cannot be foreseen. At the same time, the pollution emitted per ton of ¢sh produced has decreased successively over the last 20 years. In this con£ict, this paper provides an overview on: (1) pollutants typical for £ow-through trout aquaculture, (2) their source and potential environmental impacts and (3) strate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
1
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Determined ranges and mean nutrient increases in effluents in our study are broadly consistent with the summarized data for several rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss farms (Stewart et al 2006, Sindilariu 2007, Aubin et al 2009, Sindilariu et al 2009, Tello et al 2010. Effluent characteristics are also in concordance with the results of previous research on flowthrough rainbow trout farms in the same region as our study (Tekinay et al 2009, Bilgin Yıldırım & Pulatsü 2011.…”
Section: Effluent Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Determined ranges and mean nutrient increases in effluents in our study are broadly consistent with the summarized data for several rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss farms (Stewart et al 2006, Sindilariu 2007, Aubin et al 2009, Sindilariu et al 2009, Tello et al 2010. Effluent characteristics are also in concordance with the results of previous research on flowthrough rainbow trout farms in the same region as our study (Tekinay et al 2009, Bilgin Yıldırım & Pulatsü 2011.…”
Section: Effluent Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…3), in catchments under the effect of diffuse discharges from industrial as well as treated and untreated sewage wastes of urban community (Neal and Jarvie, 2005;Jarvie et al, 2008). For a well thrive aquaculture, DO and BOD are critical to a certain degree (Sindilariu, 2007;Shamir et al, 2015), are dominated by COD as well as A/T and W/T, (Fig. 4 and 5) respectively (Foy and Rosell, 1991;Roque d'Orbcastel et al, 2008;Mehet and Huseyin, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 and 5) respectively (Foy and Rosell, 1991;Roque d'Orbcastel et al, 2008;Mehet and Huseyin, 2014). Chloride can be removed up to 90-95% via aeration and distillation, but the removal of hardness is highly difficult (Sindilariu, 2007;Sindilariu et al, 2009b); thereby the ratio of alkalinity may increase (Dalsgaard and Pedersen, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects are due partly to the toxicity of substances such as ammonia and nitrite, but mostly to the promotion of eutrophication (Sindilariu, 2007;Simōes et al, 2008). Eutrophication of freshwater ecosystems is increasingly being recognised as a major environmental problem in Australia (Davis and Koop, 2006).…”
Section: Potential Environmental Effects Of Effluent From Inland Salimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquaculture effluent contains nutrients in both particulate and dissolved forms (Sindilariu, 2007). Technologies for treating aquaculture effluent have been mainly based on the mechanical separation of solids to purify drained water using static and rotating screens, or in the case of flow through systems, effluent sedimentation in tanks or ponds (Van Rijn, 1996).…”
Section: The Role Of Constructed Wetlands In Treatment Of Effluent Frmentioning
confidence: 99%