1981
DOI: 10.1016/0090-3019(81)90153-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction cranioplasty for neglected hydrocephalus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected or developed a technique to address each patient's particular pathomorphology. If the blood loss is not excessive, reduction cranioplasty can be safely accomplished in one stage, as we did in one o f our cases and as reported by others [6,3], Because o f the risk o f large blood loss, we recommend that staging be considered in all cases. Proce dures can be staged in many ways, but we believe that it is most reasonable to make the scalp incision, strip the peri cranium, and accomplish most o f the osteotomies in the first stage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We selected or developed a technique to address each patient's particular pathomorphology. If the blood loss is not excessive, reduction cranioplasty can be safely accomplished in one stage, as we did in one o f our cases and as reported by others [6,3], Because o f the risk o f large blood loss, we recommend that staging be considered in all cases. Proce dures can be staged in many ways, but we believe that it is most reasonable to make the scalp incision, strip the peri cranium, and accomplish most o f the osteotomies in the first stage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…In 1979, Vries and Habal [2] described a 5-staged procedure in which the supraorbi tal margins were repositioned in conjuction with a reduc tion cranioplasty; they used a midline (sagittal) strut of bone as the base upon which the remaining pieces o f the lateral convexity o f the skull were reattached, after having been reduced in size. In 1981, Ventureyra and D aSilva [3] reported using a similar technique in a 3-year-old boy via a bicoronal incision. In 1982, Ehni [4] published the treat ment 30 years earlier o f a patient with macrocephaly using specially designed gap-closing devices (designed by patient's father) in a series o f 13-staged procedures over 22 months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduction cranioplasty is required in certain cases of hydrocephalic macrocephaly to decrease the size, weight, and contour of the significantly enlarged head. 3,6,15,16 In our study, 5 patients with an average age of 54 months (range 16-97 months) underwent reduction cranioplasty and all had improvement in motor function, including head control, sitting, and walking/standing. In addition, all parents were very satisfied and were uniformly pleased with the improvement in their child's appearance after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the technical details and outcomes of using surgical methods for the treatment of hydrocephalic macrocephaly remain the focus of intensive discussions. 3,4,6,7,11,15,16,18 In this study, the clinical profile and outcome of the children with hydrocephalic macrocephaly who had undergone shunt surgeries with 1-stage total cranial vault remodeling were analyzed retrospectively. In addition, the feasibility of surgery for total cranial vault remodeling in children with hydrocephalic macrocephaly is discussed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][7][8][9] Previous reports describe large holocalvarial reconstructions with substantial risk of hemorrhage, transfusion, prolonged time on the operating table, and multiple stages. Our technique limits the en tire process of reduction cranioplasty/fixation to 2 steps: placement of a CSF shunt, followed by a single cranial remodeling and fixation procedure that takes less than 1 hour.…”
Section: Early Cranial Fixation In Extreme Hydrocephalusmentioning
confidence: 99%