1976
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4165(76)90395-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction by cycloheximide of lysosomal proteolytic enzyme activity and rate of protein degradation in organ-cultured hearts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 ' 20> 21> 24 A disadvantage of this method should be noted, namely that cycloheximide, itself, causes some alteration in cardiac proteolytic rates, 21 ' 22 as may the use of an amino aciddeficient medium. 25 Thus, as discussed in detail previously, 22 primary inhibition of protein synthesis can secondarily produce a less severe but progressive inhibition of protein breakdown (possibly via alterations in lysosomal lability, depletion of proteins with short half-lives that may be important in regulating proteolysis, or accumulation of metabolites that may influence proteolysis). Nevertheless, if both control and experimental hearts are exposed to cycloheximide, its influence on protein degradation can be assumed to be similar in both, and qualitative differences reasonably can be attributed to the experimental intervention.…”
Section: " 17mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2 ' 20> 21> 24 A disadvantage of this method should be noted, namely that cycloheximide, itself, causes some alteration in cardiac proteolytic rates, 21 ' 22 as may the use of an amino aciddeficient medium. 25 Thus, as discussed in detail previously, 22 primary inhibition of protein synthesis can secondarily produce a less severe but progressive inhibition of protein breakdown (possibly via alterations in lysosomal lability, depletion of proteins with short half-lives that may be important in regulating proteolysis, or accumulation of metabolites that may influence proteolysis). Nevertheless, if both control and experimental hearts are exposed to cycloheximide, its influence on protein degradation can be assumed to be similar in both, and qualitative differences reasonably can be attributed to the experimental intervention.…”
Section: " 17mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, we observed two intriguing facts in the present experimental work: (1) although cycloheximide is currently reported as a protein synthesis inhibitor and as effectively blocking PRL biosynthesis (Swearingen, 1971), total protein content of pituitary cell extracts after culture in the presence of cycloheximide was not decreased in comparison with control pituitary cell extracts (Table 1B). A comparable phenomenon associated with reduced lysosomal proteolytic capacity has been observed in organ culture (Wildenthal & Griffin, 1976). However with the particular culture technique we used, the context is different: the bulk of newly synthesized proteins by the pituitary cells consists of PRL and GH (Velkeniers et al, 1988); consequently, total protein content of cellular extracts mainly represents residual cellular hormone content and is not contaminated by tissue protein as is the case for organ culture, where one deals with total tissue protein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The first report on a dual inhibitory effect of cycloheximide appeared in 1969 (18). Succeeding studies pointed to an impact of cycloheximide on lysosomal protein degradation because the inhibitory effect on protein degradation correlated with the activity of some lysosomal cathepsins (20,21). More recently, it was found that presence of cycloheximide led to the accumulation of polyubiquitinated murine chains in yeast S. cerevisiae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second and third equation describe the time evolution of the DRiPs fraction and the native (folded but nonfluorescent) protein. k 21 , a 1 and k 22 , a 2 denote the elementary rate constants for the synthesis and proteolytic degradation of these two different protein pools. The rate of protein synthesis is set to be proportional to the concentration of the messenger RNA.…”
Section: Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%