2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction behavior of iron oxides in hydrogen and carbon monoxide atmospheres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
337
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 609 publications
(387 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
23
337
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…S2), but CO and H 2 reduce iron oxides at higher temperatures producing CO 2 and water respectively [9] . In the case of CO, the Pt cluster efficiently adsorbs the molecule and delivers it to the cluster/support interface where it extracts O lattice to create CO 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…S2), but CO and H 2 reduce iron oxides at higher temperatures producing CO 2 and water respectively [9] . In the case of CO, the Pt cluster efficiently adsorbs the molecule and delivers it to the cluster/support interface where it extracts O lattice to create CO 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…100 8C than that over Fe 0.5 Mn 0.5-TiO x , which was mainly due to the absence of iron species. During the reduction process of iron and manganese containing catalysts, a small fraction of iron species was firstly reduced to metallic Fe 0 nanoparticles, which could dissociate H 2 into H atoms; in the presence of the in situ formed water vapor, the dissociated H atoms could be transferred effectively to further reduce the manganese oxides through the so-called H-spillover effect [62][63][64]. This Hspillover effect could significantly lower the reduction temperature of T 2 peak, which was a new feature introduced by the coexistence of iron and manganese species.…”
Section: H 2 -Tprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study did not distinguish between co-current and countercurrent flow of hydrogen, and no data are presented on the concentration of hydrogen in the steam generator tubes. Given the results of Kizu and Tanabe [84,85], however, it is likely that counter flow of hydrogen was the cause of the reduction in tritium permeation rate across the steam generator tubes rather than just the mere presence of hydrogen with tritium.…”
Section: Countercurrent Hydrogen Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other oxide catalysts might be used for higher temperatures. MnO 2 is able to reduce hydrogen effectively in the temperature range 300-500ºC [83], and Fe 2 O 3 works effectively as a reduction catalyst over the range 150-880ºC [84].…”
Section: Chemical Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%