Abstract. Modulation excitation spectroscopy (MES) is a promising tool to analyze timeresolved EXAFS data during reproducible catalytic processes and was applied in two differentexperiments to evaluate the benefits compared to conventional analysis strategies. Thereby, phase sensitive detection (PSD) was applied directly to the x-ray absorption spectra as well as to the Fourier transformed extracted EXAFS. In both cases the results were discussed with respect to the achievable level of noise reduction as well as the possibilities to better understand the underlying mechanisms of the reactions, more precisely the dynamics and possible intermediate species. The results clearly demonstrate serious limitations for the application of MES in time-resolved EXAFS studies as soon as more sophisticated steps than averaging over several modulation cycles are performed
IntroductionIn catalysis and materials science often only small but rapid structural changes occur under varying reaction conditions. In this case modulation excitation spectroscopy (MES) has received much attention which makes use of monitoring the structural changes by periodically changing the conditions [1,2]. In case of reversible structural changes the alternating part of the signal, which is the frequency response of the active species to the applied excitation, can be separated from the often dominant non-varying part. Furthermore, by considering only frequencies that can be assigned to the excitation, it is possible to efficiently suppress random noise. For catalytic applications, the technique has been widely used in infrared spectroscopy [2]. In addition, it has been found useful when studying materials by Raman spectroscopy and XRD [3].In a first step we straight forwardly improved the signal-to-noise ratio by averaging over all cycles [4] which is possible due to the exactly known cycle duration T and the fact that T is an integer multiple of the measurement time for one spectrum. With this approach the original time resolution of the experiment is maintained while photon statistics are significantly improved. Afterwards, the more advanced phase sensitive detection (PSD) approach can be applied, where the spectra of the cycle are studied with the modulation frequencies only and the measured response is resolved dependent on the phase shift to the applied modulation [5]. An alternative way to increase sensitivity is low pass filtering followed by conventional XAS data analysis. Presently, it is strongly discussed which of these approaches is more useful or how they complement each other. Hence, we present here a comparison of the two approaches by analysing QEXAFS data in two model reactions [6].