PsycEXTRA Dataset 2006
DOI: 10.1037/e577702012-027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing uncertainty in visual search through the priming of visual-relatedness and the manipulation of observer expectancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual search is one of a number of psychological constructs that can be influenced by experimental priming manipulations. Priming manipulations that have influenced visual search vary in range from verbal to visual primes (for examples, see Chiao, Heck, Makayama, & Ambady, 2006;Hailston & Davis, 2006;Kristjánsson & Campana, 2010;Kunar & Humphreys, 2006;Laarni & Nyman, 1997;Lamy, Carmel, Egeth, & Leber, 2006;Lavie & Fox, 2000;Linnell & Humphreys, 2007;Rice, Clayton, Trafimow, Keller, & Hughes, 2008;Soto & Humphreys, 2006). The impact of priming on conjunctive visual search may be somewhat underestimated (Kristjánsson, Wang, & Nakayama, 2002).…”
Section: Visual Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual search is one of a number of psychological constructs that can be influenced by experimental priming manipulations. Priming manipulations that have influenced visual search vary in range from verbal to visual primes (for examples, see Chiao, Heck, Makayama, & Ambady, 2006;Hailston & Davis, 2006;Kristjánsson & Campana, 2010;Kunar & Humphreys, 2006;Laarni & Nyman, 1997;Lamy, Carmel, Egeth, & Leber, 2006;Lavie & Fox, 2000;Linnell & Humphreys, 2007;Rice, Clayton, Trafimow, Keller, & Hughes, 2008;Soto & Humphreys, 2006). The impact of priming on conjunctive visual search may be somewhat underestimated (Kristjánsson, Wang, & Nakayama, 2002).…”
Section: Visual Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oftentimes, it is possible to affect visual search performance via priming participants (Kunar & Humphreys, 2006; Lamy, Carmel, Egeth, & Leber; 2006; Linnell & Humphreys, 2007). Some primes that have been used in the past include visual‐relatedness (Hailston & Davis, 2006), shape‐priming (Laarni & Nyman, 1997), verbal primes (Soto & Humphreys, 2007), and many others (Chiao, Heck, Makayama, & Ambady, 2006; Lavie & Fox, 2000; Soto & Humphreys, 2006). Typically, these primes involve some aspect of the visual system itself, and are directly related to the visual cognitive process such as ‘imagining’ what the target or prime looks like or having the description of the target or prime read out loud (Soto & Humphreys, 2007).…”
Section: Private and Collective Self‐primingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research conducted on UAS operation found that participants rarely utilized the automation, even when time pressure was added and workload was increased (Ruff et al, 2004). The effects of time pressures have been addressed in human factors literature, including the effects on performance and workload (Hughes and Babski-Reeves, 2005;Svenson, 1997;Burke et al, 2007;Glade, 2000), and the effect with the assistance of decision aids (Sarter et al, 2001;Hailston and Davis, 2006), however, there is very limited research existing for the specific effect of time pressure on UASs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%