Purpose
At present, proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) for growing children is delivered to the whole vertebral body (WVB) to avoid asymmetric growth. We aim to demonstrate the feasibility and potential clinical benefit of delivering vertebral body sparing (VBS) versus WVB CSI with passively scattered (PS) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in growing children treated for medulloblastoma.
Methods
Five plans were generated for medulloblastoma patients, previously treated with CSI PS proton radiation therapy (PRT): (a) single posterior-anterior (PA) PS field covering the WVB (PS-PA-WVB), (b) single PA PS field including only the thecal sac in the target volume (PS-PA-VBS), (c) single PA IMPT field covering the WVB (IMPT-PA-WVB), (d) single PA IMPT field, target volume including thecal sac only (IMPT-PA-VBS) and (e) two posterior-oblique (−35°, 35°) IMPT fields, target volume including thecal sac only (IMPT2F-VBS). For all cases, 23.4Gy(RBE) was prescribed to 95% of the spinal canal. Dose, LET and variable-RBE-weighted dose distributions were calculated for all plans using the TOPAS Monte Carlo system.
Results
IMPT VBS techniques spared efficiently the anterior vertebral bodies (AVB), even when accounting for potential higher variable RBE predicted by linear energy transfer (LET) distributions. Assuming RBE=1.1, V10Gy(RBE) decreased from 100% for the WVB techniques to 59.5–76.8% for the cervical, 29.9–34.6% for the thoracic and 20.6–25.1% for the lumbar, and V20Gy(RBE) decreased from 99.0% to 17.8–20.0% for the cervical, 7.2–7.6% for the thoracic and 4.0–4.6% for the lumbar AVB when IMPT VBS techniques were applied. Corresponding values for the PS VBS technique were higher.
Conclusions
Advanced proton techniques may sufficiently reduce the dose to the vertebral body and allow for vertebral column growth for children with CNS tumors requiring CSI. This holds even when considering variable RBE values. A clinical trial is planned for VBS to the thoracic and lumbosacral spine in growing children.