Reducing Topdressing N Fertilization with Variable Rates Does Not Reduce Maize Yield

Abstract

Proximal sensing represents a growing avenue for precision fertilization and crop growth monitoring. In the last decade, precision agriculture technology has become affordable in many countries; Global Positioning Systems for automatic guidance instruments and proximal sensors can be used to guide the distribution of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) fertilization using real-time applications. A two-year field experiment (2017–2018) was carried out to quantify maize yield in response to variable rate (VR) N distribution, which was determined with a proximal vigour sensor, as an alternative to a fixed rate (FR) in a cereal-livestock farm located in the Po valley (northern Italy). The amount of N distributed for the FR (140 kg N ha−1) was calculated according to the crop requirement and the regional regulation: ±30% of the FR rate was applied in the VR treatment according to the Vigour S-index calculated on-the-go from the CropSpec sensor. The two treatments of N fertilization did not result in a significant difference in yield in both years. The findings suggest that the application of VR is more economically profitable than the FR application rate, especially under the hypothesis of VR application at a farm scale. The outcome of the experiment suggests that VR is a viable and profitable technique that can be easily applied at the farm level by adopting proximal sensors to detect the actual crop N requirement prior to stem elongation. Besides the economic benefits, the VR approach can be regarded as a sustainable practice that meets the current European Common Agricultural Policy.

Assessment of hail damages in maize using remote sensing and comparison with an insurance assessment: A case study in Lombardy

“…The drawback of these technologies for small-scale farms is their inherently low spatial resolution, which can be unsuitable for highly fragmented agricultural landscapes. Using vegetation indices (VIs) as a single indicator quantifies and simplifies the understanding of one or several specific biophysical parameters of the crop (Schillaci et al, 2021). Historically, most VIs developed for crop yield prediction purposes are focused on large areas (Hamar et al, 1996;Sibley et al, 2014;Lopresti et al, 2015).…”

Produtividade de milho e custo da aplicação em cobertura de fertilizantes nitrogenados

“…It is also the nutrient applied in the greatest amount in the corn crop, as it is the most limiting factor in the growth and development of the plants, therefore making it the most expensive fertilizer in the crop production cost (SOUZA et al 2015). Thus, studies are needed to reduce nitrogen fertilizers in topdressing and not decrease corn yield (SCHILLACI et al 2021). However, N is a nutrient that has a more significant effect on increasing grain yield (QUEIROZ et al 2011).…”