Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2002.1036138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the "No Fault Found" problem: Contributions from expert-system methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[6,15,21,22,23,24]. Most methods are based on the total probability theorem, such as Decomposition method and Factoring Algorithm, in which a keystone components ( ) should be defined and then the reliability of the system can be expressed as: (1) The most common approach that is widely used for determining reliability of a complex system is based on the idea of a Tie-set (Path-set) or a Cut-set. A tie-set is a complete path through the RBD and a cut set is a set of blocks (components) which interrupts all connections between the input and the output ends when removed from the RBD [6,19].…”
Section: Complex Systems Reliability Assessme T Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[6,15,21,22,23,24]. Most methods are based on the total probability theorem, such as Decomposition method and Factoring Algorithm, in which a keystone components ( ) should be defined and then the reliability of the system can be expressed as: (1) The most common approach that is widely used for determining reliability of a complex system is based on the idea of a Tie-set (Path-set) or a Cut-set. A tie-set is a complete path through the RBD and a cut set is a set of blocks (components) which interrupts all connections between the input and the output ends when removed from the RBD [6,19].…”
Section: Complex Systems Reliability Assessme T Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in the process of analyzing complex system failures, there are high proportion of No Defect Found (NDF), also known as No Trouble Found (NTF) and No Fault Found (NFF), which can be caused by missing interface or interaction failure analysis [1,2]. In addition, most existing reliability analysis methods considered the physical component failure as causes of system failure and have not well considered the interface (interaction) failure as a reason of system failure.…”
Section: Troductiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that a great deal of NFF occur in avionics, electrical and electro-mechanical systems, however research discussions have also revealed that software (including Built-In-Tests (BIT)) is also a key contributor to the problem [5,24,25,26] [27] for railways, or the IEC 60812 [28] is often referred to when carrying out Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) 4 for software based systems), that can be used to validate software operation and meet specific requirements. However, since standards and guidelines are prepared to be generic, they only briefly consider the handling of any malfunctions caused by software faults and their effects in FMEA [29].…”
Section: Software Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. On-site or practical feedback: To close the loop with reliability, new system failure modes are often discovered adding to the troubleshooting difficulties [26], and acts as a source of feedback to design engineering for reliability improvements.…”
Section: Troubleshooting: In Theory If Fault Isolation Manualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No-fault-found (NFF) has financial impact on all industries, but the transport and aerospace sectors suffer more than others [1]. The American Trans Air member airlines spend $100 million annually on NFF in terms of thousands of flight delays and cancelations [2] and the cost of aircraft troubleshooting and recovery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%