2010
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the incidence of twins from IVF treatments: predictive modelling from a retrospective cohort

Abstract: All patients receiving SET would have a higher chance of successful treatment in that cycle if they received DET. The selection of appropriate patients for SET can partially ameliorate the overall loss. For complete cycles, repeat SET could produce more live births per egg retrieval than repeat DET. All treatments involving SET will increase the number of treatments required to achieve a successful outcome and this extra treatment burden will be a significant barrier to the implementation of such treatments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Embryo cryopreservation has the potential to reduce multiple gestation rates through an eSET paradigm in which embryos from the same stimulation are transferred, one at a time, in subsequent cycles. Repeat SET was shown to be equivalent to or outperform repeat DET in the towardSET Collaboration predictive model in terms of cumulative live birth rate and the risk of twins, provided that loss of viability due to freeze-thaw was moderate or less [26]. Dizygotic twinning was also eliminated in the repeat SET model, whereas the repeat DET model predicted a 20.9 % twin rate with a lower overall live birth rate (39.0 % vs. 41.4 %; [26]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Embryo cryopreservation has the potential to reduce multiple gestation rates through an eSET paradigm in which embryos from the same stimulation are transferred, one at a time, in subsequent cycles. Repeat SET was shown to be equivalent to or outperform repeat DET in the towardSET Collaboration predictive model in terms of cumulative live birth rate and the risk of twins, provided that loss of viability due to freeze-thaw was moderate or less [26]. Dizygotic twinning was also eliminated in the repeat SET model, whereas the repeat DET model predicted a 20.9 % twin rate with a lower overall live birth rate (39.0 % vs. 41.4 %; [26]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeat SET was shown to be equivalent to or outperform repeat DET in the towardSET Collaboration predictive model in terms of cumulative live birth rate and the risk of twins, provided that loss of viability due to freeze-thaw was moderate or less [26]. Dizygotic twinning was also eliminated in the repeat SET model, whereas the repeat DET model predicted a 20.9 % twin rate with a lower overall live birth rate (39.0 % vs. 41.4 %; [26]). Moreover, there is accumulating evidence that both pregnancy rates [1,27,[30][31][32] and obstetric and neonatal outcomes [11,19] may be improved in cryopreserved cycles, specifically due to uncoupling the processes of COH and embryo transfer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, what really matters to the infertile couples under IVF treatment is whether there will be a success or not after a completed treatment cycle which includes fresh plus cryopreserved embryos transferred from one stimulated cycle. Few studies (Roberts et al, 2011) have been done to address this question. Therefore, our study concentrated on the chance of achieving a pregnancy after the completed treatment cycle per couple treated and only considered the candidate variables collected before embryo transfer of the fresh cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent retrospective studies [16,23] shows that elective single embryo transfer after replacement of thawed embryos results in similar pregnancy rates and a significant decrease in multiple pregnancy rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%