2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-60128-7_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the Gap Between the Conceptual Models of Students and Experts Using Graph-Based Adaptive Instructional Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, they derive linguistic properties at four different levels: descriptive, lexical, syntax and cohesion and automatically predict the students' vocabulary score using several ML algorithms. In addition, there are also approaches that attempt to externalise students' implicit knowledge by using concept maps (Giabbanelli & Tawfik, 2020; Kim et al, 2019; Kim & McCarthy, 2021; Wu et al, 2012). Wu et al (2012) compare concept maps of students with those of teachers using an existing key word list and provide hints on what students need to change.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, they derive linguistic properties at four different levels: descriptive, lexical, syntax and cohesion and automatically predict the students' vocabulary score using several ML algorithms. In addition, there are also approaches that attempt to externalise students' implicit knowledge by using concept maps (Giabbanelli & Tawfik, 2020; Kim et al, 2019; Kim & McCarthy, 2021; Wu et al, 2012). Wu et al (2012) compare concept maps of students with those of teachers using an existing key word list and provide hints on what students need to change.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this assumes that the students use the same vocabulary as in the reference model. Therefore, Giabbanelli and Tawfik (2020) use a thesaurus database in order not to depend on an exact match between student and expert concept maps. Other works even analysed the effect of automatically generated knowledge structures (KS) from text as a reflection method to improve summary writings (Kim et al, 2019; Kim & McCarthy, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As learners engage in these tasks, they must remedy knowledge gaps and work with their peers to reconcile different perspectives. Beyond just retention of facts, learners also engage in information seeking (Belland et al, 2020), question generation (Olney et al, 2012), causal reasoning (Giabbanelli & Tawfik, 2020;Shin & Jeong, 2021), argumentation (Ju & Choi, 2017;Noroozi & Hatami, 2019), and other higher-order thinking skills.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this gap, our study evaluates the usability of a software that seeks to support policymakers in using a systems map of obesity. Usability is indeed essential to ensure the effective uptake of a tool; however, it has rarely been studied for maps, and only in the context of educational technologies for knowledge assessment [30][31][32] where software difficulties are occasionally reported [33]. Our study thus contributes to the literature by evaluating the ability of eight policymakers to interact with systems maps through recorded sessions that follow best practices in usability testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%