2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the fat content in ground beef without sacrificing quality: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
1
18

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
2
90
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…It is of great importance that the ingredients used for fat replacement could compensate for the altera-tions in quality parameters of low-fat meat products. Utilization of non-meat binders obtained from protein and carbohydrate sources is a common strategy for fat replacement in meat product formulations, which could mimic the behaviors of fat by increasing water binding, emulsification, gelling and thus improving product yield, texture and sensory quality (Brewer, 2012).…”
Section: Application Opportunities Of Inulin In Meat Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of great importance that the ingredients used for fat replacement could compensate for the altera-tions in quality parameters of low-fat meat products. Utilization of non-meat binders obtained from protein and carbohydrate sources is a common strategy for fat replacement in meat product formulations, which could mimic the behaviors of fat by increasing water binding, emulsification, gelling and thus improving product yield, texture and sensory quality (Brewer, 2012).…”
Section: Application Opportunities Of Inulin In Meat Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground beef is considered by many to be the most popular and most versatile of all bovine products (Brewer, 2012). Ground beef is more perishable than whole muscle cuts of meat and should be handled with particular care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies report moisture increase in reduced fat meat products and this is related to high meat content, as well as the level of soluble solids in the formulation (Pietrasik and Janz 2010;Brewer 2012). The experimental results for starch level ranged from 2.16 % (MOD2) to 4.32 % (CORN) and were in accordance with the added percentages of starch in the formulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In addition, the red color becomes more intense, hardness increases, and the water binding capacity decreases (Weiss et al 2010;Brewer 2012); the sensory quality is also impaired, which decreases the acceptability of the meat product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%