2012
DOI: 10.1186/2048-7010-1-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing subsistence farmers’ vulnerability to climate change: evaluating the potential contributions of agroforestry in western Kenya

Abstract: Subsistence farmers are among the people most vulnerable to current climate variability. Climate models predict that climate change will lead to warmer temperatures, increasing rainfall variability, and increasing severity and frequency of extreme weather events. Agroforestry, or the intentional use of trees in the cropping system, has been proposed by many development practitioners as a potential strategy to help farmers reduce their vulnerability to climate change. This study explores whether and, if so, how… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
132
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tree farming systems in the Philippines provided a range of annual incomes equivalent to IDR 2,374,802-163,553,043 ha -1 yr -1 , which greatly exceed incomes provided by annual crop systems, and the imperata grassland shifting cultivation system (Predo 2002). Tree-based production systems are also promoted in government policies because of their perceived biological, economic and social resilience in the context of anthropogenic climate change and other production challenges (Alfaro et al 2014;Steffan-Dewenter et al 2007;Thorlakson and Neufeldt 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree farming systems in the Philippines provided a range of annual incomes equivalent to IDR 2,374,802-163,553,043 ha -1 yr -1 , which greatly exceed incomes provided by annual crop systems, and the imperata grassland shifting cultivation system (Predo 2002). Tree-based production systems are also promoted in government policies because of their perceived biological, economic and social resilience in the context of anthropogenic climate change and other production challenges (Alfaro et al 2014;Steffan-Dewenter et al 2007;Thorlakson and Neufeldt 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agroforestry may be able to build livelihood resilience to the impacts of climate change for smallholder farmers. Although there has been significant research about agroforestry technologies, less is known about how agroforestry contributes to building livelihood resilience (Thorlakson and Neufeldt 2012). There has been a call from the academic and development communities for more empirical evidence about the links between agroforestry and livelihood resilience to climate change (Lin 2011, Thorlakson andNeufeldt 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, innovative adaptation practices can reduce vulnerability of the exposed biophysical systems in general, the rural population in particular with a consequent reduction in vulnerability (Thorlakson and Neufeldt, 2012;Zhang et al, 2007).…”
Section: Adaptation Gaps and Adaptive Capacity Of Farmersmentioning
confidence: 99%