2020
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing resistance to repeating a wiki activity: What can teachers do?

Abstract: Her research is focused on ecological consumer behavior, environmental marketing strategies and the new technologies impact in higher education. Her research has been published in journals such as

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After reviewing the abstracts of the 167 articles, 38 articles were selected for in-depth analysis based on research studies of social media use in K-12, undergraduate, and graduate educational settings. Results revealed the use of social media to support a variety of purposes including writing skills (e.g., Lee & Kim, 2016;Lin, 2015;O'Byrne & Murrell, 2014;Tan, 2017;Thomas, 2017;Xie & Lin, 2016); content acquisition (e.g., Forbes & Khoo, 2015;Kennedy et al, 2014); knowledge or language acquisition (e.g., Altanopoulou, Tselios, Katsanos, Georgoutsou, & Panagiotaki, 2015;Çetinkaya & Sütçü, 2018;Huang et al, 2014;Resendes et al, 2015;Voroble et al, 2021); usability and accessibility of technology (e.g., Gachago et al, 2016); collaborative learning and sense of community (e.g., Asoodar et al, 2014;Biasutti, 2017;DeWitt et al, 2017;Fraj-Andrés et al, 2020;Kuo, Belland, & Kuo, 2017;Sun et al, 2018;Zhang et al...…”
Section: Mixedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reviewing the abstracts of the 167 articles, 38 articles were selected for in-depth analysis based on research studies of social media use in K-12, undergraduate, and graduate educational settings. Results revealed the use of social media to support a variety of purposes including writing skills (e.g., Lee & Kim, 2016;Lin, 2015;O'Byrne & Murrell, 2014;Tan, 2017;Thomas, 2017;Xie & Lin, 2016); content acquisition (e.g., Forbes & Khoo, 2015;Kennedy et al, 2014); knowledge or language acquisition (e.g., Altanopoulou, Tselios, Katsanos, Georgoutsou, & Panagiotaki, 2015;Çetinkaya & Sütçü, 2018;Huang et al, 2014;Resendes et al, 2015;Voroble et al, 2021); usability and accessibility of technology (e.g., Gachago et al, 2016); collaborative learning and sense of community (e.g., Asoodar et al, 2014;Biasutti, 2017;DeWitt et al, 2017;Fraj-Andrés et al, 2020;Kuo, Belland, & Kuo, 2017;Sun et al, 2018;Zhang et al...…”
Section: Mixedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several recommendations that can be considered when implementing Web 2.0 in higher education courses. Some argue that it is important to select technology that provides an | 651 intuitive, high-quality user interface (Fan et al, 2016), while others place the emphasis on the need to provide training sessions and explain the benefits of the activities where the technology is used (Fraj-Andrés et al, 2020).…”
Section: Web 0 Succe Ss Ful Implementati On: a Con Cep Tual Fr Ame Workmentioning
confidence: 99%