2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing Patient Waiting Times for Radiation Therapy and Improving the Treatment Planning Process: a Discrete-event Simulation Model (Radiation Treatment Planning)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(Hussein et al, 2017) presented effective results reducing overcrowding in a hospital. Similar results were shown by (Babashov et al, 2017) and (Shim & Kumar, 2010) Although these studies present positive results, we found some limitations in them. Some papers did not consider variables and statistical distributions for different workgroups (Reynolds et al, 2011) and processes (Rau et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discrete Event Simulation and Lean In Healthcare Systemssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…(Hussein et al, 2017) presented effective results reducing overcrowding in a hospital. Similar results were shown by (Babashov et al, 2017) and (Shim & Kumar, 2010) Although these studies present positive results, we found some limitations in them. Some papers did not consider variables and statistical distributions for different workgroups (Reynolds et al, 2011) and processes (Rau et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discrete Event Simulation and Lean In Healthcare Systemssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…(Hussein et al 2017) presented effective results reducing overcrowding in a hospital. Similar results were shown by (Babashov et al 2017) and (Shim and Kumar 2010) by decreasing patients' waiting time in an emergency department. (Rau et al 2013) and (Uriarte et al 2017) also used DES to reduce patient waiting time in treatment centers and the radiotherapy sector, respectively.…”
Section: Literature Backgroundsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The next feature variable that can be used for the split point is the patient's age. The split point based on age can be determined by Equation 6. The split point based on the age of the patient will be obtained based on the results of Equation 6 which has the smallest value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%