2012
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2011.2173432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing Mutual Coupling of MIMO Antennas With Parasitic Elements for Mobile Terminals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
188
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 341 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
188
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the recent years, numerous designs of MIMO antenna systems have been investigated for wireless applications and are mainly focused on sufficiently minimizing the effect of mutual coupling between radiating elements and presenting different convenient techniques in order to implement an efficient and compact MIMO system [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. These systems were developed for various bands including single and/or dual band, GSM band, LTE band, WiMAX band, and two ISM bands covering 2.45 GHz and/or 5 GHz band.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the recent years, numerous designs of MIMO antenna systems have been investigated for wireless applications and are mainly focused on sufficiently minimizing the effect of mutual coupling between radiating elements and presenting different convenient techniques in order to implement an efficient and compact MIMO system [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. These systems were developed for various bands including single and/or dual band, GSM band, LTE band, WiMAX band, and two ISM bands covering 2.45 GHz and/or 5 GHz band.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems were developed for various bands including single and/or dual band, GSM band, LTE band, WiMAX band, and two ISM bands covering 2.45 GHz and/or 5 GHz band. The proposed methods for reducing mutual coupling included employing a simple microstrip patch element in between the antennas [6], using parasitic coupling elements between the radiators [7,8], connecting the elements employing a neutralization line [9,10], introducing resonators between the antenna elements [11], placing the antenna elements in an orthogonal configuration [12,13] and metamaterial-based antennas [14]. Alternatively, Electromagnetic Band Gap (EBG) cells [15] and partially extended ground [PEG] plane [16] may be used to eliminate coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various works appear in literature in which MIMO antenna systems are analyzed in terms of their effect on the multiplexing gain in different environments [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Some of them used theoretical models to emulate the channel and used the antenna elements radiation patterns to analyze the performance of the MIMO antenna system [8,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] presented a comparison between the measured mutual coupling effect on the ergodic channel capacity of a MIMO system in a Rayleigh channel and in Rician channel at Long Term Evolution (LTE) radio band. A method to reduce MC among MIMO antennas by inserting parasitic elements is proposed in [8], and the 1-D EBG and SRR structures were experimentally shown to be very effective in suppressing mutual coupling [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] presented a comparison between the measured mutual coupling effect on the ergodic channel capacity of a MIMO system in a Rayleigh channel and in Rician channel at Long Term Evolution (LTE) radio band. A method to reduce MC among MIMO antennas by inserting parasitic elements is proposed in [8], and the 1-D EBG and SRR structures were experimentally shown to be very effective in suppressing mutual coupling [9].In this paper, we will study the MC effect on multiple antennas system and derive some new expressions of receiving signal vector and power, channel correlation and capacity. Firstly, we construct an equivalent channel model Manuscript received May 10, 2016; revised July 13, 2016.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%