Reducing multi-hop calibration errors in large-scale mobile sensor networks

Abstract

Frequent sensor calibration is essential in sensor networks with low-cost sensors. We exploit the fact that temporally and spatially close measurements of different sensors measuring the same phenomenon are similar. Hence, when calibrating a sensor, we adjust its calibration parameters to minimize the differences between co-located measurements of previously calibrated sensors. In turn, freshly calibrated sensors can now be used to calibrate other sensors in the network, referred to as multi-hop calibration.We are the first to study multi-hop calibration with respect to a reference signal (micro-calibration) in detail. We show that ordinary least squares regression-commonly used to calibrate noisy sensors-suffers from significant error accumulation over multiple hops. In this paper, we propose a novel multi-hop calibration algorithm using geometric mean regression, which (i) highly reduces error propagation in the network, (ii) distinctly outperforms ordinary least squares in the multi-hop scenario, and (iii) requires considerably fewer ground truth measurements compared to existing network calibration algorithms. The proposed algorithm is especially valuable when calibrating large networks of heterogeneous sensors with different noise characteristics. We provide theoretical justifications for our claims. Then, we conduct a detailed analysis with artificial data to study calibration accuracy under various settings and to identify different error sources. Finally, we use our algorithm to accurately calibrate 13 million temperature, ground ozone (O3), and carbon monoxide (CO) measurements gathered by our mobile air pollution monitoring network.

Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Blind Macro-Calibration of Environmental Sensors in Participatory Sensing

“…The mean squared error is a standard metric to quantify measurement errors [23]. The NMSE, the mean squared error normalized by the ground truth, is calculated as follows:…”

Spectroscopic real-time monitoring of NO<sub>2</sub> for city scale modelling

“…This can be expected for two reasons: (i) the larger distance, (ii) the location of site SCH at a crossroad where traffic flow is controlled by traffic lights. The calibration of sensors using precise measurements from AQM sites is an option for mobile operated sensors (Arfire et al, 2015;Saukh et al, 2015). However, this analysis clearly 15…”

Outlier-robust calibration method for sensor networks

“…When the sensors are mobile, they can be in rendezvous, i.e., they are in the same spatio-temporal neighborhood, thus sensing the same phenomenon [6]. Such an assumption was recently used 1 in both micro- [8], [9], [10] and macro-calibration 2 [12], [13], [14]. However, in the case of fixed sensors, other assumptions are needed.…”