2011
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing Model Complexity of the General Markov Model of Evolution

Abstract: The selection of an optimal model for data analysis is an important component of model-based molecular phylogenetic studies. Owing to the large number of Markov models that can be used for data analysis, model selection is a combinatorial problem that cannot be solved by performing an exhaustive search of all possible models. Currently, model selection is based on a small subset of the available Markov models, namely those that assume the evolutionary process to be globally stationary, reversible, and homogene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Determining how to best depict and model the heterogeneity of the substitution process across branches in large phylogenetic datasets has recently attracted much attention and led to many developments (e.g. Blanquart & Lartillot, 2006;Boussau & Gouy, 2006;Dutheil & Boussau, 2008;Jayaswal et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2011). In this study, we chose to merge species into clusters based on their body mass because we had strong prior expectations regarding its relationship with dN/dS, and also because we were interested in the first place in the reconstruction of ancestral body mass.…”
Section: Mtdna As a Marker Of Species Life-history Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining how to best depict and model the heterogeneity of the substitution process across branches in large phylogenetic datasets has recently attracted much attention and led to many developments (e.g. Blanquart & Lartillot, 2006;Boussau & Gouy, 2006;Dutheil & Boussau, 2008;Jayaswal et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2011). In this study, we chose to merge species into clusters based on their body mass because we had strong prior expectations regarding its relationship with dN/dS, and also because we were interested in the first place in the reconstruction of ancestral body mass.…”
Section: Mtdna As a Marker Of Species Life-history Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, standard models are usually designed with the simplifying assumptions that the evolutionary process was globally stationary, reversible, and homogeneous (Yang 2006; Jermiin et al 2008; Jayaswal et al 2011a) (Fig. 1a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, some methods do not estimate one matrix per branch, but use groups of branches that share substitution matrices (Yang 1998; Foster 2004; Dutheil and Boussau 2008). These groups can be defined a priori (Dutheil and Boussau 2008), or estimated during the course of the computation (Jayaswal et al 2011a; Dutheil et al 2012). Similarly, Bayesian approaches have been developed that place breakpoints along the branches of the phylogeny: substitution models are shared by all branches between breakpoints, but change at breakpoints (Blanquart and Lartillot 2006, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to accommodate data that have evolved under non-SRH conditions is to employ models that relax the SRH assumptions. A number of non-SRH models have been implemented in a variety of software packages (Foster 2004;Lartillot and Philippe 2004;Blanquart and Lartillot 2006;Boussau and Gouy 2006;Jayaswal, et al 2007;Knight, et al 2007;Dutheil and Boussau 2008;Jayaswal, et al 2011;Sumner, et al 2012;Zou, et al 2012;Groussin, et al 2013;Jayaswal, et al 2014;Nguyen, et al 2015;Woodhams, et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%